Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Media spin........Kate ordered to return money TOO

In the baffling coverage of this divorce so one-sided we're surprised Lady Justice hasn't fallen over with the weight on her right, it was no surprise to us to find out that most media is only reporting half the story.......that Jon was ordered to return $180,000 to the marital account.

However People, who previously seemed to be on Kate's side, is also reporting the judge ordered any money improperly drawn, including the $100,000 Kate withdrew, to be replaced.

Could the media be any more obvious they bat for Kate? Start reporting the FACTS. The judge told BOTH these clowns to return their money, that is the facts. We will do our very best to give you a fair and impartial view of what is going on here, but the 200 to 1 articles spinning this story in Kate's favor make it difficult.

http://www.realitytvworld.com/news/judge-orders-jon-&-kate-jon-and-kate-gosselin-both-return-cash-9724.php

4 sediments (sic) from readers:

Anonymous said...

Kate Gosselin returned that money a long time ago. Get your stories straight. Bet you didn't know that Jon Gosselin just bought a new Audi and Kate found out when she tried to use her credit card to pay for gas and it was denied. It was then she found out that Jon had just bought a brand new Audi. Too late to file papers in court.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

That's an awful big assumption. Who is your source for the Audi? I have not seen that in any of my research and would like to post it if true. I cannot post things without at least an incline of a source.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

People is one of the few sources reporting BOTH of these clowns withdrew money improperly, not just Jon. They are both behaving badly, why the media is all Team Kate and Jon is the devil baffles me. Although really no one is reporting the real facts, that Jon and Kate are stealing money from the children. This is, after all, money all made from the children's show.

Administrator said...

That's an awful big assumption. Who is your source for the Audi? I have not seen that in any of my research and would like to post it if true. I cannot post things without at least an incline of a source.

Post a Comment

Want to see your comment published? Follow a few simple rules:

1. Do not use Anonymous. Pick a name (click Name/URL to type in a name) and stick to the same name.
2. Anonymous insider stories should be emailed to us directly (in confidence). They will not be posted here unless we can verify the validity, such as with photos. This is not to discourage legitimate insiders from speaking out, but to guard against all the fake stories out there.
3. No insulting other posters or picking fights, refusing to let things go and move on. Stop with the snotty comments--they will be rejected. Treat people here like how you would talk to the person you most respect in your life, it's just pleasant that way.
4. No trash talking other blogs/bloggers here.