Monday, March 24, 2014

The Apprentice leaks thread: Week 1

The pervasiveness of social media has made it easy to know what's going on as Kate films Celebrity Apprentice.  Tomorrow afternoon Kate and the teams will be at Pie Face in NYC. The men will be at one location, the women the other. Both teams will apparently be selling pies for charity. A first look has already been posted, and suggests things are already pretty intense for the women's team as they bake pies, make phone calls, and prepare for the task tomorrow. Other information suggests call time today was 3 a.m.

Feel free to post other pics, tweets and sightings here. As we go along the month-long shooting schedule we will likely continue to do a new thread each week. If you don't want to be spoiled, avoid the thread!

Courtesy of Babble

272 sediments (sic) from readers:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 272 of 272   Newer›   Newest»
Unknown said...

Over In TFW's County said... 190
I guess I must have misplaced my pearls...probably lost them the last time I clutched them!
+++++++++++
''I've seen this pearl-clutching reference made before. What does it mean, and to whom is it directed?''
~~~~~~~
I've used pearl-clutching before when I'm talking about someone being shocked about something that I don't consider shocking. I think when the phrase first started it usually was aimed at someone that was 'old-fashioned' and alarmed by something said or done by someone that was younger and no longer behaving the way previous generations (who would wear pearls) did.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Someone asked if TFW could commute back home to PA. Now what in the world kind of fun would it be to have to go back to the kids after basking in the glow of celebrity all day?

Remember when TFW came back from her free tummy tuck and said to her kids, I don't ever want to miss another week of your life again?
She sure changed her mind about that in a hurry.

chefsummer #Leh said...

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 191
I think both the person cheating and the person in a relationship with a cheater are equally at fault, as long as that person in a relationship is aware that the other person is married.
______

This is my point.

The Neild's and The Gosselin's were friends at one time. Their kids spent time together.

It take two to have an affair so I say blame both parties that are in it.

Jane said...

I'd love to be on the crew of this show. Hope they talk. Can't you see Kate rolling her eyes and flapping her hands and crying?

This is from Penn Jillette who was on 2 seasons of CA

"In his book, Jillette blasts Trump for the infamous boardroom scenes, which last only minutes on TV, but take hours to film because The Donald is so full of hot air."

Paper Plates Forever! Yay! said...

pic.twitter.com/3yK0mVvkrL

How odd. It looks like she has decided to smile differently. Usually we see all her bottom teeth when she smiles and flashes her veneers. Maybe all the horse teeth comments starting getting to her.

It is really quite unbelievable that she is getting yet another chance for redemption on TV and this is actually a pretty decent one. It has the ability to showcase another side of her - her organization skills, her ability to work on a team and of course, to show that she has been able to keep current with the Hollywood look. Let's face it, if she was ugly, she would not be on CA. I have always thought Kate looks quite good with all the professional hair and makeup.

I truly don't think it's about the money for Kate. It's her chance to prove to people that she has what it takes to play with the big stars now because all her minions have told her so. Don't forget her mantra: if you say I can't do it, guess what, now I'm going to do it just to spite you.

We (meaning all of the Kate detractors) all say how out of place she looked in that little instagram clip, carrying the bags. We say that because we all know that she does not belong there and has not earned the right to be there. She knows it and she knows we know it. She's the lonely onion in a field of lavender. But her PR people are good whoever they are because it absolutely amazes me that she keeps going and getting these amazing opportunities. I think it's more than a ratings draw issue with her. She is getting these chances because someone actually believes she has the ability to make something of herself in the media. Hope I'm wrong...

Over In TFW's County said...

Someone asked if TFW could commute back home to PA. Now what in the world kind of fun would it be to have to go back to the kids after basking in the glow of celebrity all day?

+++++++++

If they film every day of the week, logistically, it wouldn't make sense. She'd be on the road six hours a day, getting home late, only to turn around and leave again at 2 a.m. if there is a 5:30 a.m. call. She couldn't take the train because last I checked, the earliest train from Philly to NY leaves at 5 a.m. and she wouldn't get there in time. If she commuted, she'd be home only to sleep.

What did Steve do at the pie store? Sit at a table all day, waiting for Kate to yell, "Haters, Steve. Over here NOW!" He has such a tough job. No wonder he sticks with her.

Kelly said...

NJ, I would have handed that fur baby over to you three days ago if he wasn't so damn cute. He's a chewing, pooping monster who's had some tummy upset. Giving Pepto per the vet's instructions sure is fun. More went on the floor than in him. On top of it all, my 12 year old Boxer came down with an awful ear infection so I've had some growling, nipping, get- that- pup- away- from -me attitude. Thankfully it's all getting better now and Rude Boy begins his puppy manners class Thursday night. I bought a playard and Bulldozer toppled it within one day. I've got my work cut out for me with this one!

This is sorta OT, but still refers to pies. I just finished Saloma Furlong's second autobio Bonnet Strings and not only was the book fantastic but she included some unique Amish pie recipes. I'm an avid baker and have an impressive collection of Amish cookbooks but had never seen her crust recipe before. I can't wait to get to the grocery store & begin trying these recipes. That is when I can leave the house for more than an hour ;)

Math Girl said...

Susie Cincinnati said...
If that's the case, then why did so many states allow divorces to be granted on the grounds of Alienation of Affection, and the person responsible for breaking up the marriage could find themselves as a defendant in a court of law?
---------------
Alienation of affection is against the third party (who "stole" the other person's spouse) and is only allowed in a few (7) states these days. It's a tort (civil offense) rather than a crime. Alienation of affection does not require proof of extramarital sex.

Divorce is a different matter, and affects the couple only, not the third part. In Canada, adultery is grounds for divorce. It does require proof of extramarital sex.

In the US, divorce is governed by state law, so will vary from state to state. In Colorado and Washington for example, adultery is not ground for divorce and doesn't affect property division or alimony decisions. Every state allows no-fault divorce, where adultery is irrelevant. Some also allow "fault" divorce based on adultery. I couldn't find a list or count of how many states do - don't have time to google all 50.

Does someone with better resources than mine know how many states allow divorce based on adultery?

Over In TFW's County said...

TFW always looks like she's been sucking lemons when caught off guard.

+++++++++++

Would that make her a sour puss?

Thanks, Remona, for the explanation about pearl clutching. I'm not old-fashioned, nor a prude, or a member of the older generation, but I guess when it comes to morals and values, then I am a pearl clutcher! My grandmother left me a double string of gorgeous pearls that she wore on her wedding day (she was married for 65 years), I will happily hold on to those!

Sad but true said...

Bitchy Pants said... 197
...
Since I've never seen the show, I have a question -- is it possible that TFMJG is staying at home and commuting to NYC daily for filming, or is it required of contestants that they stay there for the duration?

Kate commute from PA?! That would utterly defeat her purpose, which is certainly in large part being AWAY from her kids and staying in a nice hotel for as long as possible. (Although I don't doubt we'll "hear" that she's raced home one Sunday because she misses them SO much.) I'm sure there's some swag involved as well, you know she'd cross the country for a freebie.

I don't think she was able to cut some kind of special remuneration deal with Trump. I think she begged her ass off to get on this show, she has NO other prospects besides this lame TLC hour coming up. If he offered her $25,000 (or whatever the standard amount is), he wasted his money--he very likely could have had her for $2,500, just so she could be in a group called "celebrity." Whatever happens, she intends to dine out on this for the rest of her "celebrity career."

BTW, I don't believe this is anywhere near a 6-week commitment, I was always under the impression it was no more than 3-4. Also, it's being cut back to a one-hour show from two. If they're really filming 12-14 hours per day, 6 days a week, I think 6 weeks is way too long. Some of these people (not Kate, of course) really DO have other business commitments to get on with--like Donald and Ivanka, for example.

AuntieAnn said...

FlimsyFlamsy said... 2

Remember when TFW came back from her free tummy tuck and said to her kids, I don't ever want to miss another week of your life again?
She sure changed her mind about that in a hurry.

====

I remember, Flimsy. That was when she was still a budding reality tv star, a virgin of the genre, if you will. ha! She was only just finding out what TLC would reward her with, if only she'd sell just a little more of her kids' privacy to them one half hour at a time. It was like watching Snow White morph into Maleficent.

Jane said...

Wonder if this means the women won today's task. Or maybe Brandi is loving The Donald's champagne!

@BrandiGlanville: Thank you for EVERYTHING today tweeples! I looooooooooove you! My twitter people fucking rock! #CharityPieFace

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

I am a pearl clutcher!

&&&&

See I think similar to Remona, in that that's not pearl clutching.

It's not simply holding the morals and judgements themselves that make you a pearl clutcher. I would hope at this age we have all firmly established what our morals and values are including how we may feel about cheating. It's taking the next step and turning up your nose at people with different outlooks on how to live life and considering your life choices smugly superior that is pearl clutching. And I don't think it applies to every situation that you disagree with, I think it more tends to apply to "traditional" values like relationships, drinking, partying, etc. We're not talking about "pearl clutching" because someone is exploiting their kids, that's very different and goes far beyond a simple live and let live analysis.

I don't look "down' ON Kate and Steve's relationship, if there is one, nor do I much care. I don't think it's healthy for the kids, and that's certainly my opinion. I just don't think that's pearl clutching. I think that's one set of values vs. another and I certainly co-exist just fine with many people who hold different values on such matters. I could not, however, co-exist on a regular basis with a child exploiter, etc.

AuntieAnn said...

Bitchy Pants said... 197

Auntie Ann -- Big Barney Miller fan here. I loved the hash laden brownies episode, but my favorite is the one where the prisoner thinks he's a werewolf. Kevin Tyger was so funny as the prisoner, and Nick Yamana's reaction to him was hilarious.

====

Oh God, yes. I've forgotten half of them, but that was one of the funniest episodes too. They were all good.

I hated to see Barney Miller end and felt the same way when Family Ties ended. There was really some great tv back then.

Margo said...

I truly don't think it's about the money for Kate. It's her chance to prove to people that she has what it takes to play with the big stars now because all her minions have told her so. Don't forget her mantra: if you say I can't do it, guess what, now I'm going to do it just to spite you.

We (meaning all of the Kate detractors) all say how out of place she looked in that little instagram clip, carrying the bags. We say that because we all know that she does not belong there and has not earned the right to be there. She knows it and she knows we know it. She's the lonely onion in a field of lavender. But her PR people are good whoever they are because it absolutely amazes me that she keeps going and getting these amazing opportunities. I think it's more than a ratings draw issue with her. She is getting these chances because someone actually believes she has the ability to make something of herself in the media. Hope I'm wrong...

********************
What big stars? Big stars don't do CA. It's a mix of reality TV people, people trying to resurrect careers, etc. Not exactly an A list crowd.

Unknown said...

Over In TFW's County at 9...
Telling someone to clutch their pearls can be about many things, not just morals and values. I think the last time I used the phrase was over all the hysteria about Jon peeing in someone's driveway. Or maybe it was all the upset over Jon's cursing? Or maybe it was about Jon being so outspoken about TCFW on CT? To ME, none of those things are immoral or anything to be concerned about, though all those things sure concerned many on this blog!

Maybe what it really boils down to is a kind of shorthand way to tell another person that you strongly disagree that whatever they are upset about is anything to be upset about?
PS
What Admin said at 13!!

Over In TFW's County said...

Does someone with better resources than mine know how many states allow divorce based on adultery?

+++++++++++

I'm not sure about that, but I do know that in half of the states, adultery is still a criminal offense. There's an interesting thing about a divorce on grounds of adultery in PA. There doesn't need to be proof of sex having occurred. It's circumstantial -- nobody has to witness the actual sex act; however, BOTH disposition and opportunity must be proven. Holding hands is considered disposition, and if you are seen going into a motel room with another person, that is opportunity.

In addition, if a wife cheats on her husband, he can file for divorce on those grounds, but if they decide to get back together again (even if it's just for one day), have sex, and separate again, then the previous charge of adultery is null and void if she hasn't cheated the second time around.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

I was watching the Real Housewives reunion and Brandi said that her ex Eddie won't let her film the kids because he doesn't want them on T.V. She says she doesn't want them to be the main focus she just wants them sort of around in the background so another side of her can be seen. Of course, even though you would assume Bravo would side with their cast member Brandi, instead they have honored Eddie's wishes not to include the kids.

Bravo has no problem not getting involved in a dispute like that and refusing to film children until it is resolved. It appears TLC is one of the few networks who doesn't care about a parent's concerns and does whatever they want. I just hope Brandi and TFW don't bond over their mean awful ex's who don't want their children exploited.

Carole said...

Well, well, well. It looks like TFW has her trusty 'companion' Steve with her for the duration of CA. According to this article they were together Tuesday. One word comes to mind - pitiful.

Lots of pics on this page:

http://news-all-the-time.com/2014/03/26/kate-gosselin-smirks-as-shes-spotted-with-her-rumoured-boyfriend-and-bodyguard-steve-neild-after-his-wife-posts-that-defiant-picture/

Heidi Hi said...

http://news-all-the-time.com/2014/03/26/kate-gosselin-smirks-as-shes-spotted-with-her-rumoured-boyfriend-and-bodyguard-steve-neild-after-his-wife-posts-that-defiant-picture/ Heh heh..she can't take a s*it without backpack boy.

Ex Nurse said...

Over in TFW Country said...
In what states? Is this with or without parental consent, and must it be approved by a judge?
-----
New Hampshire allows girls to marry at 13, and boys at age 14. The state requires the consent of parents and a judge. Florida allows boys and girls under the age to marry if there is a pregnancy, with no minimum age. As a matter of fact there is a bill being drafted because as recently as 2012, a 13 year old boy was married because he impregnated someone.

Ex Nurse said...

TFW Country--the pearl clutching phrase came from a now defunct blog. They referred to posters of this blog as pearl-clutchers.

As far as the cheating allegations, we are still talking about holding hands, right? Or, did I miss some major proof that there is, or was an affair? Because, if we are talking about holding hands, why is this being characterized as something akin to an open marriage?

Rhymes with Witch said...

While I think that pearl wearing refers to June Cleaver, et al., I have always thought that "pearl clutching" implied a histrionic or hysterical (over reacting) component.

Rhymes with Witch said...

Okay, this comment is about the headline, not the article:
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/03/gwyneth-paltrow-chris-martin-split-separate-divorce-goop-consciously-uncouple/

What is the alternative? To uncouple unconsciously?

Heidi Hi said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2589534/Kate-Gosselin-smirks-shes-spotted-rumoured-boyfriend-bodyguard-Steve-Neild-wife-posts-THAT-defiant-picture.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

this is better. Its the source. Looks like a cheap hotel, definitely not one of the Don's..look at the scratches on the door, like it's the tradesman entrance. Surprised Steve isn't carrying her boots..c'mon backpack/purseboy..help the lil lady out, it is windy ya know.

Rhymes with Witch said...

Admittedly standing on my soapbox:

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/03/little-couple-terror-santa-christmas-kids-dwarfism-will-zoe-jen-arnold-video/

So this little girl is like thousands of other children.
Her dwarfism is important to this story why?
My respect for this couple just took a nosedive.

gotyournumberKate said...

Bravo has no problem not getting involved in a dispute like that and refusing to film children until it is resolved. It appears TLC is one of the few networks who doesn't care about a parent's concerns and does whatever they want. I just hope Brandi and TFW don't bond over their mean awful ex's who don't want their children exploited.

I think it's terrible the way Jon is disregarded in having a say over his childrens lives. I also think Kate is a monster and no one crosses her. Let's face it, out of the two parents Kate is the stronger one. She goes after what she wants and doesn't care who she has to knock down along the way. I'm sure she's the one who leaked that story about her brother in law and we haven't heard a peep from them since. She puts people in their place in a flash. Even though they are divorced Jon still allows Kate to call the shots. I don't know what all he has done to try to stop her from filming his children and from keeping him from seeing them but I do know if that were me she wouldn't be getting away with it. I would fight with everything I had to see my son and twin daughters. They are not old enough to make that kind of decision on their own. Just like Eddie and Simon, if I didn't want my children filming they wouldn't be filming but I have a very strong personality and in my opinion Jon is very weak. I'm honestly starting to think Jon would rather be sitting in a bar than working hard to support his family. What man with 8 children waits tables for a living? When my children were small I worked a fulltime job and 2 part time jobs to support them. One of my part time jobs was in the middle of the night and the other was on weekends when they were with their father so I was still able to be with them. It looks to me like Jon would rather allow Kate to call the shots than have to work hard to support them. Jon can talk the talk but I have yet to see him walk the walk. I feel so sorry for those children who have no parent protecting them or looking out for their best interests. We can make every excuse in the world for Jon but the bottom line is he is lazy, immature, and weak man. Just my opinion, take it for what you will.

Wowser said...

Oh yes she DID get botoxed up before CA..her forehead looks like a tan ice rink.....it looks like fillers around her mouth too.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2589534/Kate-Gosselin-smirks-shes-spotted-rumoured-boyfriend-bodyguard-Steve-Neild-wife-posts-THAT-defiant-picture.html

Katykat said...

I saw at that video on vine...w/ the bandana she's a dead ringer for an aging Axl Rose.

Localyocul said...

So I see she didnt bother to thank her supporters before or after heading back to the hotel with lover boy . And really, she had to change clothes?

Localyocul said...

Forgot the link

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2589534/Kate-Gosselin-smirks-shes-spotted-rumoured-boyfriend-bodyguard-Steve-Neild-wife-posts-THAT-defiant-picture.html

Molly12 said...

I saw the pictures of Kate and Steve going into their hotel yesterday. Two things 1) I do think he helped her off camera with the task 2) Whatever money she is making on CA, it is going straight into his pocket (unless of course he truly is just her boyfriend now).

Paula said...

Good grief...such drama from Kate's and her "people" whoever they are. that picture was posted in JANUARY, not after the article accusing Kate of inappropriate conduct with a married man.

Ex-Nurse, under the original definition of adultery, Kate would not be guilty of adultery (unless the relationship started before she and Jon were divorced as some believe) but would be guilty of fornication and biblically speaking would be just as guilty as Steve-O.

PA Dutch Mom said...

I don't know what all he has done to try to stop her from filming his children and from keeping him from seeing them but I do know if that were me she wouldn't be getting away with it. I would fight with everything I had to see my son and twin daughters.

&&&&&&&&

Then I would hope that you have bottomless pockets to do it, and a judge who doesn't get frustrated and sick and tired of seeing you in court,

"What man with 8 children waits tables for a living?"

&&&&&&&

A man who wants to work to make a living, no matter what that job is. The fact is that he has a job, or perhaps two, and I believe that he does more than just "waits tables." This sounds like something Kate would say -- it's a mediocre job. At least he has one.

"We can make every excuse in the world for Jon but the bottom line is he is lazy, immature, and weak man."

&&&&&&&&&&

No, he is not.

TLC stinks said...

Hmm. So are you saying that the hotel she and Steve are staying at is NOT the hotel where the others are . If so, and I wish the pap had mentioned the hotel, then they want their alone time ?

I agree he is helping her. There is no doubt they are a couple. Any other husband would have left so the paps would not be taking photos of them together.

So the suitcase she was dragging yesterday morning contained a change of clothes. Why? Because she knew the pap would be there at the hotel. I cannot stand her. Talk about rubbing this in Gina's face.

Janice said...

I don't know what all he has done to try to stop her from filming his children and from keeping him from seeing them but I do know if that were me she wouldn't be getting away with it. I would fight with everything I had to see my son and twin daughters.
***************
What possibly could Jon have done that would allow TFW to keep his kids from seeing him? In my world, this is NEVER allowed. It has NOTHING to do with paying or not paying child support. If he is not allowed to see his kids, there better be a damn good reason. No Judge would ever allow one parent to keep the kids from seeing another parent. Something else is going on here.

Marie said...

In my opinion, when two people get involved and one is married, BOTH are guilty of breaking up a family. You can spout all the semantics you like.

Marie

Marie said...

As far as Kate and Steve being a couple? Who knows. No one here knows for sure. They have never been publicly outed doing anything inappropriate.

Marie

Paula said...

"Diversion" alert....

MikeB said...

That is probably the service entrance. I'm sure TFW insisted on being let in by the back door because she feared being mobbed by her fans/haters if she went in the public entrance.

Carole said...

The reality star was spotted being mean to everyone says an eyewitness, and she can’t stand RHOBH star Brandi Glanville. She was barking orders and bossing everyone around because she “knows how to cook” — she released a cookbook and now she thinks she knows more than anyone else there.

A few of the customers in line were laughing and saying they wish they could throw a pie in her face. She’s more of a TV villain that ever.

You’ll love to hate her this season.

http://www.naughtybutnicerob.com/kate-gosselin-a-monster-during-nyc-celebrity-apprentice-charity-event/



I know this sounds like a sheeple defending TFW, but it's me, the same person who has rarely, if ever, defended TFW so please don't shoot me. lol
As much as the article sounds like the TFW we know it reeks w/no specifics. This reads like pure PR by mixing facts from the past to suit the present situation to get readers/viewers.

Tucker's Mom said...

"We can make every excuse in the world for Jon but the bottom line is he is lazy, immature, and weak man."

&&&&&&&&&&

No, he is not.
*******
That describes Kate, not Jon- who has actually worked a few real jobs since the show
I am as critical of Jon as they come- mostly when it comes to his kids continuing to be filmed. But, he's always been a very loving dad.

Carole said...

Re my comment ^^^^^ about the NaughtybutNiceRob article:

And, I'll feel like a huge fool for being skeptical when I see on tape that she did indeed act true to form on the first task. LOL

jbranck1980 said...

As much as the article sounds like the TFW we know it reeks w/no specifics. This reads like pure PR by mixing facts from the past to suit the present situation to get readers/viewers.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I agree. Until the episodes air and we see/hear how TFW acts, it seems like any article is for promotional purposes to get viewers. I just can't believe she doesn't care she is being used for this purpose though. I would be mortified...not to mention how the 8 kids must feel!

Tucker's Mom said...

Kate is pathetic- really, Steve has to be carrying her bags wherever she goes.
I wonder if he has to wipe her butt, too.
I thought the contestants had to do their part alone.
I guess not.

I wonder how many other CA "contestants" are permitted to bring their domestics?

Vanessa said...

In my opinion, when two people get involved and one is married, BOTH are guilty of breaking up a family. You can spout all the semantics you like.
***************************************************************************
I agree. The word "homewrecker" says it all.

Tucker's Mom said...

I agree he is helping her. There is no doubt they are a couple. Any other husband would have left so the paps would not be taking photos of them together.
&&&&&&&&
What a sham- the whole thing.
Unless you are managing your ENTIRE day alone, you are cheating.
Sure, take a cab or a company car or a limo, but don't have a domestic doing your schlepping.
Pathetic!

Tucker's Mom said...

I know this sounds like a sheeple defending TFW, but it's me, the same person who has rarely, if ever, defended TFW so please don't shoot me. lol
As much as the article sounds like the TFW we know it reeks w/no specifics
*****
No sheeple accusing here!
My bet? It's true- just like the reports about filming in Alaska.
I could NOT believe how horrible it sounded and how hard to believe Kate would actually act that bad. But it was true- actually, it was worse.

Carole said...

Looks like TFW has enlisted more PR help for the CA appearance this time cross promoting the crookbook.

@CharlotteBoomer
We're sharing Kate Gosselin's Eggplant Parmesan recipe at http://www.boomerbrief.com/2014/03/splendid-eggplant-parmesan.html … pic.twitter.com/kinSIrNyM5

From their website:

About Us: "BoomerBrief.com is written by Boomers for Boomers. The brains behind BoomerBrief.com are Bob and Charlotte. Bob is a slightly-graying public relations exec... in real life he's still in his 50's. Charlotte is a PR exec too... She's in her 50's... "

Vanessa said...

What a sham- the whole thing.
Unless you are managing your ENTIRE day alone, you are cheating.
Sure, take a cab or a company car or a limo, but don't have a domestic doing your schlepping.
Pathetic!
*****************************************************************
Can't decide who I find more pathetic, him or her

Tucker's Mom said...

Marie said... 37
In my opinion, when two people get involved and one is married, BOTH are guilty of breaking up a family. You can spout all the semantics you like.

Marie
*****
The married party is only marginally more a sinner, IMO.
The interesting thing is how a woman (or man) can find a married spouse attractive when the spouse is a liar, a cheat and a duper.
The spouse took vows and then shit on them. How does a woman think he's attractive when his morals are so horrid.
Can't they see that sooner or later, he'll treat her the exact same way?

Anyhoo... I don't believe that Steve and Gina have such a strong relationship that she can stand him galavanting around the globe with Kate.
Kate can not FUNCTION without Steve. We're not talking body guarding here- Kate needs him on every single level.
I personally could live live with a man who is another woman's EVERYTHING.

Suzy said...

I think Steve is her security blanket. And her paid friend as well. I don't think she can function in public settings without someone to shield or guide her around. She doesn't want to do it alone! So odd.

I also notice she is dressing similar to Brandi. Same boots. Same leggings, etc. she changed her boots--she had uggs boits on then changed to high heel boots. Her hair looked ridicilious! Almost as if she took off the hair off a Barbie doll & put on her head.

Suzy

Call Me Crazy said...

Carole said... 43

Re my comment ^^^^^ about the NaughtybutNiceRob article:

And, I'll feel like a huge fool for being skeptical when I see on tape that she did indeed act true to form on the first task. LOL
__________________________________

Carole - You do not sound like a sheeple at all. You sound like a reasonable person who knows not to take any of these tabloid "stories" at face value unless and until you have facts to verify their accuracy. That is what separates our muumuu/crock-wearing crowd from the woolly, cloven-hoofed crowd.

Now having said that, it would not surprise me in the least if Kate was acting that way. Her bad behavior is a defense mechanism to make her feel less inferior. She has to get angry and bossy to try to disguise her complete ineptitude.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

Having Steve along is cheating, I agree. You're not supposed to have any support system or an outside person to talk to, get advice from. It's supposed to be you and your team and that's it. Unbelievable. So is his family okay with him being gone for four straight weeks to be her security blanket? I don't think she's allowed to go home when she's fired, I think they sequester them.

Over In Kate's County said...

In what states? Is this with or without parental consent, and must it be approved by a judge?
-----
New Hampshire allows girls to marry at 13, and boys at age 14. The state requires the consent of parents and a judge. Florida allows boys and girls under the age to marry if there is a pregnancy, with no minimum age. As a matter of fact there is a bill being drafted because as recently as 2012, a 13 year old boy was married because he impregnated someone.

++++++++++++++

Thanks for the info. So it's just two states, and only with certain stipulations. When I read your post, I thought...what the heck, states allow marriage at age 13, thinking it was many more than just two.

Tucker's Mom said...

Suzy said... 52
I think Steve is her security blanket. And her paid friend as well. I don't think she can function in public settings without someone to shield or guide her around. She doesn't want to do it alone! So odd.
******
What's odd her her drum-beating about how much she's grown and how now she's doing everything alone.
Jon was just replaced with Steve.
Before and after my first marriage, I did for myself. Especially after my divorce- I lived alone, paid all of my own bills, never had help for anything.
I can't stand when people are in awe of Kate- she's had help! Still does!
Kate can't function without her shadow.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

"What man with 8 children waits tables for a living?"


&&&&

First of all, he's a host. But it shouldn't matter.

Second of all, this is insulting. He works at two higher end restaurants where you can make a good living. Sure, it is harder to make a good living at a burger joint, but that's not what these places are. They are more on the fine dining side, and if you look at the menus dinner for two is going to run you at minimum 60-70 bucks a pop if you're ordering alcohol. That's a fine tip. The hospitality industry is a fine and respectable career that many upstanding people enter every single day because it is a fine and respectable career.

I can't stand when people look down on someone's job based on a stereotype. He may very well make more in four nights work than he would in six work days doing IT. It may make great sense. The point being, at least one parent is willing to accept that reality T.V. is not a career and at least one parent is showing these children that a mediocre job is something you have to do to support your family, there is no shame in it, and you should show up to work every day with your head held high because there is honor in supporting your family with your own hard work and sweat. Jon is their only hope of developing a work ethic, period.

Tucker's Mom said...

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 54
Having Steve along is cheating, I agree. You're not supposed to have any support system or an outside person to talk to, get advice from. It's supposed to be you and your team and that's it. Unbelievable. So is his family okay with him being gone for four straight weeks to be her security blanket? I don't think she's allowed to go home when she's fired, I think they sequester them.
****
I always thought that these reality tv contestants were sequestered with their cohorts. Not a living situation that I would want! But, I thought they bunked, ate and generally lived with one another- and no media.
No tv, no cell phones etc.
I've watched a couple competition shows (Top Chef) where the contestants are all but cut off from the world.

It is totally cheating to have Steve attached to Kate's hip.
I'm betting that Kate will be called out on it, because no way everyone has their assistant tagging along.
The thing is- Steve has ALWAYS been there. He's just gotten very good at hiding.
Remember the RV pizzagate scene? Steve (and the crew) was shuffling around trying to duck out of camera range. He looked panicked when the cameras turned around to catch the whole scene.
I mean, he WAS the crux of the melt down. It WAS Steve's pizza and God forbid one of Kate's kids ate it!
Ashley- you were so right. It's all about Steve (which is so funny that it rhymes with Eve!)

Marie said...

Sheesh, she's probably paying more to have Steve there than she is making off of the program. What a hoot! She's probably paying his hourly or daily rate, plus his room and board. In NYC. Ha!

Marie

Over In Kate's County said...

Paula -- there are new pics out on Daily Mail that show the two of them together at the hotel. I'm not sure why this is such a shock, though. They've always stayed at the same hotel. If he's supposed to be her bodyguard (and I use the term very loosely), why would he stay at another hotel?

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

I see Rat Claws has his trusty backpack in tow. I wonder what he keeps in that thing.

I think this is cheating. Straight up cheating. Woman up, Kate. Show that you can do something, anything, on your own. It's pathetic.

Anonymous said...

I don't understand, I thought the contestants were sequestered in a Trump hotel away from all outside influence during filming. That said contestants only had themselves to rely on. If sleezy Sleeve is there with her isn't that cheating? -LIN-

Tucker's Mom said...

Her hair looked ridicilious! Almost as if she took off the hair off a Barbie doll & put on her head.

Suzy
*****
Definitely lots more hair clipped in. In some photos, you can see the high/low lights that have never been there.

TLC stinks said...

This really pisses me off about Steve. First, there is absolutely no doubt she is getting help from him. None. She must have insisted that Steve be included in her stay for CA. Second, either she and Steve have cooked up this dating thing for the publicity (she really looked pleased that the pap showed up) which is disgusting for his family and shows he has little regard for his sons (I don't respect Gina at all). Or third, they are indeed a couple and have been for years. You see, most people would say, wouldn't the wife know? Not necessarily. Many women totally trust their husbands and want to believe their assurances that it's strictly business. So Gina is: trusting of Steve, believes him; going along with the publicity for the $$$; or has an open marriage. That's all it can be. Meanwhile their sons have to deal with the rumors. Sucks to be them.


Tucker's Mom said...

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 57
"What man with 8 children waits tables for a living?"


&&&&

First of all, he's a host. But it shouldn't matter.
******
Do you think Kate's magical uterus spit out a graduate degree for Jon as well as 8 kids?
Jon has no college degree and IT is a good career choice for him.
Shit, they make double what I ever made I made in health care!
Jon's choice of job right now is fine- actually can work in his favor with the schedule.
I just can't believe people put Jon's job down when Kate has had NONE. Oh, sorry, she did CC and got shit canned.
Where's Jon's public letter of firing, stating this:
“A series of recent events have made it clear to me that Kate Gosselin and her contributions do not align with the authenticity which we set out to build almost a decade ago,” CEO Scott Kluth posted on his website Tuesday in an open letter.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...



this is better. Its the source. Looks like a cheap hotel, definitely not one of the Don's..

&&&&

I agree with what someone else said that likely this is just the kitchen door or back door to the hotel. How very Princess Diana of her. NYC has all kind of doors that look like that, but they often lead to very nice buildings.

I'm pretty sure I knew that on Celebrity Apprentice they stay in a hotel not living together. On the real Apprentice they were basically bunking up together. At least on recent seasons they never show their living quarters. I just remember in the past someone making reference to running back to their hotel to get something, or something along those lines. Whatever it was I remember at the time being a little taken aback that they're sort of able to have a nice hotel to stay in. I think it makes the experience easier, and is less fun than making them all bunk up.

We're really going to have this whole season spoiled by social media, which disappoints me.

Tucker's Mom said...

I don't tweet, but I wonder when people see that Kate is not participating in CA alone, if there will be public backlash to The Donald's attention.

Kate is cheating, straight up.

Tucker's Mom said...

Over In Kate's County said... 60
Paula -- there are new pics out on Daily Mail that show the two of them together at the hotel. I'm not sure why this is such a shock, though. They've always stayed at the same hotel. If he's supposed to be her bodyguard (and I use the term very loosely), why would he stay at another hotel?
******
My question is- wouldn't you think that with all of these "celeb" contestants doing very public challenges, that the show would provide security?
I mean, at what point does Steve let Kate do something alone? When does he stop? When Kate goes into her hotel room? When she goes into the bathroom?
What exactly does Kate do alone, all by herself?
She can't get from point A to point B without Steve.

Tucker's Mom said...

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 61
I see Rat Claws has his trusty backpack in tow. I wonder what he keeps in that thing.
***
Kate's good bra, John Gotti an the remains of The Elephant Man.

Anonymous said...

Would someone with Twitter tweet Donald T. & ask why Kate has outside help from Steve? Thanks -LIN-

Suzy said...

I have never watched an entire espiode of CA. I didn't realize these peoe were supposed to go thur it ALONE. Having Steve along defeinitely boards on cheating. When will she ever stop cheating!?! Please, someone tweet to the entire CA team, the Donald, and Mrs. Trump & ask them about this!

Suzy

Tucker's Mom said...

I wonder if it's been the norm for CA contestants to bring their staff.
Puts things in a whole different light.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 272 of 272   Newer› Newest»