Sunday, May 29, 2016

Recap: Kate Plus 8 ''Blind Date": Realitytvkids.com dating tips and more!

Coming up on The Bachelorette! Er, I mean Kate Plus 8.

Hanger on Deanna is playing the role of the well-meaning but completely misguided friend who wants to set you up, which is just a front for the producers going through a couple hundred head shots and picking this guy out. His first meeting with Kate is awkward, explains Kate. Made more awkward still by Deanna being right there in the middle introducing them like it's 6th grade. Deanna tells hot-stuff that Kate has eight kids. I kind of feel like that's something you should mention to the guy before you set him up with her. It's not an insignificant detail that you can get into later, like you prefer Netflix and chill on the weekends, or you can drive stick shift. And can't you just meet outside Starbucks with instructions that say hey I'm the guy in the green hat and you're the girl with the polka dot skirt, like normal blind dates?

Mr. Swipe Right is cute if I may say so! He unbuttons not one but two of his shirt buttons. He waxes his chest. He drinks out of little tiny tea cups.

Kate claims she has gone on a handful of dates since the divorce. Heh, no she hasn't. Kate is quite vague about how Deanna knows Vann, because she knows him mostly from his head shot, but his resume sounds good. He went to Annapolis (good heavens!). I think it's absolutely f--ing hilarious that as Kate is explaining all this, they show a photo of her with her BFF Jamie. As we know, the running joke, or maybe even truth, is that Kate's relationship with Jamie might not always have been platonic. They have admitted they've slept in the same bed, and there are a number of bootleg photos circling out there for years showing them acting very huggy-kissy. That is truly brilliant editing and has to be intentional. It just has to be. We get the joke, Vann's really just auditioning as Kate's beard. Buh-bum--ching!

More and more Kate has been appearing on camera without a stitch of make-up on, which is not what I would expect from someone like her. Deanna's coming down from New York and will do Kate's hair and make-up and take her up to New York for the date. Who's going to watch the kids? And don't they know the cardinal rule of first dates, the guy should come to her? 

They're doing a wha-what???? A helicopter ride? Well, what the heck, on my last date I only got some Thai food and a game of corn hole.


I don't trust a damn thing Kate says about what the kids have said about this date so I'm just going to ignore her recap of what she claims they said and cut straight to the kids. They're old enough to speak for themselves. Mady says with quite a bit of sass it's good for Kate to date and find a husband so she won't die alone. Heh, well that's one reason to find companionship. Meanwhile the younger kids think she's far too old to date. I love how when you're a kid 40 feels like 80, and 20 is at best, 40. Conversely, the older you get the younger people look, right? I can still remember being a freshman in college and how old and important I felt, but look at freshmen now and they are absolute babies. Goo-goo-gaa-gaa babies! Perception is so interesting. All in all none of these kids seem to mind her going on a date. Most of them are at best indifferent, and those who do care actually seem pretty selfless about this, just wanting Kate to find somebody. They see their father dating and happy, surely they have learned by now watching a parent move on and date is not that big of a deal. Anyway, I enjoy how all this flies right in the face of the sheeple, who have claimed all along Kate doesn't date for the good of her children. No, Kate doesn't date because she can't get a date, doesn't know how to get a date, is a child exploiter, opportunist and narcissist that would not make a wise partner for most men so most men avoid her, kids or no kids.

There is a very, very long segment about some of the kids helping her pick out clothes. It goes on forever.

Isn't Deanna a 40-year-old single woman? What does she know about what one should wear on their first, second or third dates? The second date should be business-like? Wtf? Deanna, that's how you find yourself 40 and single. No one wants to feel like they're meeting up with you to sign a contract, second date or not. Dating tip: Don't trust dating advice from hopelessly single friends.

At the end of this painfully long segment Kate chooses a boring but sensible little black dress.

Deanna provides a very vague story about how she's known Vann for many months (ever since she first saw his headshot), he's handsome and hard working, and would make a good match for Kate. I guess if you're looking for opposites attract you're right on the money.

Kate says one thing that I think is very true, in that having kids makes getting a date harder.  Jon has not had a problem finding dates, but Jon is not nearly as socially awkward, uptight and negative. He sends out good, friendly vibes, and he gets girlfriends, and they seem to accept his children without question. Jon could have six toes on each foot, scales for skin, and a big hairy mole on the tip of his nose, and he'd still always have a girlfriend. For some people dating, and life, comes easier.

I couldn't agree with Kate more, before she should even waste her time, or for that matter his, I think it's very important to let your date know you have eight kids. For some strange reason Deanna feels it's best to hide this fact. That's just plain silly, and can I say rude? If I know I don't want to take on a partner with eight kids no matter how nice they are, I'd appreciate you not waste my time by withholding this information. Putting myself in Vann's shoes, all kinds of thoughts would be running through my head if that information were kept from me for too long. Before they're even out of the gate bad-advice-Deanna is helping Kate to create some major red flags for her date. Good job.

As Deanna does Kate's make-up, Deanna and Kate have a long and conceited conversation about how there's no way on this planet Vann cannot recognize Kate, I mean this is Kate we're talking about here, although Deanna hasn't gotten into who she is with Vann yet. For goodness sake, she's Kate Gosselin, not Gandhi. What Deanna did say is that she told him she's a hot blonde. Kate instructs her to keep applying make-up. Heh, good one, Kate!

Kate seems to be of the mindset that a parent must be 100% focused on their kids and someday when they are grown they can think about themselves again. There are quite a few parents who would disagree with that helicopter-parenting philosophy. This also is Kate's not-so-subtle way to get in a dig at Jon, who has nurtured romantic relationships and friendships alike all along, in addition to being a good father to his children. Not only is it not healthy for you for the rest of your life to come to a screeching halt when you are a parent, but it's not good for your children. Watching a parent in healthy relationships with other people male and female is how children learn to model healthy relationships of their own. It also sends an important message to children that the world doesn't revolve around them. I've known a lot of kids whose parents don't do absolutely anything but be parents, and the kids often end up spoiled. Eventually this approach leaves parents with a crippling sense of emptiness as children grow up and develop other interests outside their parents, which happens sooner rather than latter.

Plus, Kate's kids are way too old to need her attention at all hours of the day. She should be able to find plenty of time while they are at school or with friends to look after herself and develop some interests of her own and welcome other people into her life. Moreover, she has shown time and time again she is very much about herself as much as she is about her kids, and she has spent untoward amounts of time away from them over the years, so she can stop with the martyrdom. Let's be honest, she uses her kids to cover for her inability to get a date, that's the plain truth of it. They're a convenient excuse for her as they often are.

Commercials. We're back, and Kate says goodbye to the kids. I don't see anyone around who looks like a nanny. Her limo pulls up. Seriously, a limo? Could this be any more 1-percenter? I really struggle to grasp how most of her fans relate to this. Also, isn't she at all worried about the first impression that's going to leave on her date? I.e., snob? She lives how she thinks rich people live, but most rich people do not go around taking limos everywhere much less on just a date. At most, they might valet their own car once they get to the venue, but a limo is ridiculous and even the rich know it.

The producer asks the boys how it feels to watch their mom leave for a date. I find that question extremely prying and more appropriate for a therapist to ask, but nonetheless the boys seem genuinely indifferent, they're just like the little birdie finally flew the nest. Ha, the 24/7 D.C. eagle cam is 100 times more interesting than this family, sorry boys.

Mady doesn't understand why Kate is so nervous about dating. She says something about how if you want to be nervous over this, meaning herself, that's on you. I don't know whether to find that comment funny or self-absorbed.

Kate and Deanna have a boring conversation about how Kate's nervous and is hot. Deanna asks about her dating days before marriage. Ohhhh, now we're getting into something interesting. Of course Kate won't even give up any interesting information that's already out there anyway. I'm thinking of that story about her old high school boyfriend and how she was living with him. There was a tabloid interview with him years ago, as I recall. Kate claims her high school class was so tiny there wasn't much dating and her guy friends were more like brothers. Heh, that never stopped anyone before, have you read/been traumatized by Flower in the Attic?! 

You know what's head-scratching? There's a way for her to tell the story of her past in a way that is respectful to the men she's been with while still deliciously interesting. I mean it was 20 years ago, it's not like she's dishing on yesterday's boyfriend. Instead she makes this conversation about as boring as a ham sandwich, claiming she never ever would dream of dating. But the truth is so much more engaging and would make for a much more interesting episode. She just doesn't get it.

Last time Kate dated there were pagers. Heh, yep, and cell phones that made your arm ache if you talked too long. Everyone complains about dating these days but dating was rough back then too.


Oh, finally they show their clearly full-time nanny Andrea, who can smile. I knew she had it in her. Took Kate going out of state to bring that out of her. Glad there is adult supervision here. They're making pizzas, and it's boring. Ha, Joel outs Kate by saying it's Kate's first date. I thought Kate just said she's had a handful of dates. No she hasn't, and her kids say so. I love that the kids are finally old enough to tell us what's really going on here. Her gaslighting days are over.

Mady explains that a first date is really just about assessing whether the guy is a serial killer. Holy smokes, Mady is spot on there. Yes, first things first.


Dating tip: Just pay the $29.99 and do the background check. Here, I'll pay it for you for gosh sakes.

More nosey questions from the producers, most of them I feel like they've already asked six different ways, but the sum of it all is that for the umpteenth time the kids are just fine with Kate dating if not even getting married. Why are so many of the kids concerned she'll progress too fast in this relationship before letting them meet the guy? Several say they really want to meet him and would be upset if they didn't. Exactly what I have been saying for years, many children want to meet and be involved in their parents' new relationships. They actually feel left out if you try to shelter them from it in some misguided attempt to protect them.

Andrea says it's a school night, which is just an interesting tidbit. Seems to me getting ready for school should be the priority, not filming. Stock "Italian" music as they eat the pizza. $1.99 on iTunes.

Deanna and Kate say they're excited to have an adult conversation for once, without talking about vocab words. Oh, Deanna, stop it. Geez, how do you think Andrea feels, she's the one actually taking care of these kids day-to-day.

I have never seen two friends have a more boring and pointless conversation about nothing. I hope I don't sound like this with my friends. Back at Quintland, they're running around outside with balls and a parachute and absolutely nothing happens. Much like the Roloffs these kids have a large property to enjoy, but there is a glaring difference between their episodes showing the property and the Roloffs. And that is at the Roloffs there were always three or four other kids there. Friends of the Roloff kids. There all.the.time. You literally can't go an episode without some friend of theirs popping up. Mueller and several others.

Deanna and Kate are still in their limo saying absolutely nothing worth recapping.

Commercials. Dating tip: It might be terribly awkward. But the last thing you do in a really awkward dating situation is say it's really awkward, Kate. Oy-veh!!!

The addition of a drone to this show has really improved the production values. They get some great shots of NYC. Lol, Kate doesn't want Deanna to leave right away after she introduces them. Oh for cripe sakes.

Vann's patiently waiting for Kate by the helicopter (for reals). What a weird meeting place, they're in a rather shady empty parking lot. He is tall, brunette, and has boyish, classic good looks. His suit coat is a little frumpy, but I find that endearing. Shows he's not vain.

Having been on my share of bad dates, I can tell within about five seconds Vann's not attracted to her. And that won't ever change. He's doing that awkward stare where the wheels are turning and the thought process is "well, she's pretty enough, but she's not really my kind of pretty I don't think, but let me give it a few more seconds.....nope, she's still not my type. Dang it, I have to sit through an entire date now with someone who could very well be quite nice but who is just not for me. Why do I keep doing this to myself? Damn me."

Deanna tells some not credible story about how she met Vann at a "charity" event. Which one? Name names. Was this "charity" a production meeting in Silver Spring where she and a couple producers looked through a couple hundred head shots?

The helicopter pilot looks like he'd be just as comfortable delivering pizzas down in Brooklyn. I love NYC.

This reminds me of the "rewards" Trump used to give on The Apprentice where you got to do something really lavish and once in a lifetime, like take a helicopter ride at sunset. Those were the good ole days when that show was truly the best reality show ever made.

He's from Hoboken??? Hoboken!!!!!! Hall-ahhh!!! Sorry, I have a lot of college friends from that great place.  If you can't live in NYC, please, set up shop in Hoboken.

Vann certainly knows his battleships. I do too, actually. I'll take E-6 please. Well, NYC is a thing of beauty. It really is the greatest city in the world, isn't it? The only thing profound Kate can come up with to sum up this incredible experience was, that was, like, fun.

Like, yeah.

I have to give Kate a little credit, she's trying on this date. She's asking him questions about himself, making eye contact, and trying to act interested. They head to dinner at an Italian restaurant. Gosh, Van's cute. Swipe right, swipe right, swipe right. I'm not sure why Kate thinks a parent can have nothing in common with someone who has no kids. Grr, I hate parents like that. Naturally she finds plenty of things in common with him. Duh.

Dating tip: Don't tell your date your brain is a "fruit salad."

Kate wants to know how it is Vann has ended up single without any kids at this age. Is it me or is that question really rude? Especially on a first date. Not everyone gets a girl knocked up at 18 and puts a ring on it. Some people postpone that aspect of their lives for very good reason. Career, travel, just not feeling ready for it all yet, haven't met the right girl yet. Although let's be real, some people postpone it because they want to live up being single and wealthy and party without any responsibility. Van looks like that type, and there's nothing wrong with that. In fact, I'd rather you wait on having kids until you're really ready to be attentive to them, rather than settle down prematurely before you get all of that out of your system and see your marriage end in divorce by the time you're 40.

Dating tip: No overtly personal questions on your first date! Gah!

Vann is very polite about Kate's nosey question, making a joke about how his parents ask that a lot. His parents sound like they're worried he's gay, I'm totally getting that vibe. Not that there's anything wrong with that either. Vann says he's happy, he's comfortable, and he's holding out for the best. Heh, i.e. I want to live up being single and wealthy and party without any responsibility. Got it.

Kate goes into a long speech the crux of which is that you should not just marry the first person who comes along. She is clearly implying that's what she did. She acts like Jon coerced her into marriage. Wasn't it the opposite? Didn't she basically peg him as a dentist's son and promptly steal him out from under his girlfriend, no pun intended? That can hardly be characterized as happenstance, just putting a ring on the first thing that comes along with a pretty enough face and a vagina. Gimme a break. Her bar is set so much higher now, she explains. You know what, her kids are going to listen to this! She is such a f--ing bitch about their father whom they love, there's no other way to say it. It hasn't gotten any better in five years. She's a bit more subtle about it, but not really. She just doesn't name him by name now when she slams him, as if that makes it okay.

There's a gal in the background who looks like Jenna Bush and Julia Styles had a baby. That's so classic New York.

I see the kids have been brainwashed to regurgitate Kate's mantra that it would be tough for anyone to handle eight kids. I wonder how they think school teachers do it with 30 kids or more.

Baw, Van has never seen the show. Of course he hasn't. He's out being single and wealthy when this show airs.

This guy is a professional flirt but it could not be clearer he is not that into her, as much as he is being extremely nice and polite. It's tough for a woman to get through a date where she knows he's not into you, but it's even more embarrassing when she doesn't seem to realize it.

Commercials. Little people and their dogs!

Back at the date, they're diving into the tiramisu. I once met an Italian shopkeeper in Little Italy, Baltimore who insisted he invented tiramisu. He was kind of nutty but had a nice bakery.

How many ways can the producers ask the kids if they are okay with Kate dating??? Stop! They're asking this enough some of the kids are changing their answers. Having actually studied how to interview kids effectively, like really studied what psychologists and sociologists have to say about this, in order that I can do a better job at getting good information about crimes, or child abuse, from little ones who might be a witness or victim, one of the cardinal rules is you don't keep asking the child the same question over and over. You just don't. You ask it enough and they start thinking maybe you don't like their answer and maybe they should change it. By the time a child has been asked about an incident the third time or more, there is very little left they can say that is reliable. You have to basically throw out the interview at that point, it's of no value.

What do the twins dating have to do with anything? How boring.

Vann mumbles, I've noticed. Big time mumbles like as bad as Tyler Florence. That's one of those things where you tell your girlfriends the next day, well he was so cute and sweet, but he mumbles! If that is not already a Seinfeld episode, it should be.

Oh, no, not the pity walk. This is the point in the date where he is such a nice guy he is feeling guilty knowing he will never call you again. So he asks you if you'd like to take a little walk a couple blocks before you say goodnight.

Dating tip: When he wants to take a pity walk, trust me, it's a pity walk.

They take an admittedly cute selfie and send it to Deanna who promptly responds "CUTE!!!" Yes, it was cute.

Why isn't Kate just ending this date already? Painful. Kate says she can't do anything at the end of the date because her kids will be watching this. What was she going to do if cameras weren't there, have sex with him right outside the subway stop?

Dating tip: Don't put out on the first date!!

Kate ends the date by saying "you have my information." Lol, sounds like you're trying to get the Girl Scouts off your front porch, you know where I live hit me up next year. He leans in to go for a little kiss, and she turns away. She actually turns away! He lands on her cheek. I've heard of the Puritans but this is ridiculous. Why is she being so unnaturally prudish?

Vann gives a really polite interview basically saying Kate is really nice and he doesn't know how it would work with eight kids but you go where life takes you. God he's nice.

Kate was impressed he wasn't scared off by the eight kids thing. I'm not sure it's that so much as eight kids wasn't even really registering.

Kate says they're trying to arrange a time to meet up again, which is a nice guy's way of "ghosting" you without actually ghosting you. He will forever be trying to find a good time.

Dating tip: If he likes you, that time will be found. Usually within the next couple days.


Little people fire drills!!! And we're out.

1681 sediments (sic) from readers:

«Oldest   ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 1681   Newer›   Newest»
Tucker's Mom said...

The View also doesn't have the producer whom Kate liked to flirt up.
Barbara Walters finding her "fascinating" was, and still is, virtually inexplainable. I don't get how Walters fathomed Kate had star quality and "it" factor.
Kate had a short-lived, phenomenal presence in the tabloids, but she never showed any signs of being a rising star.
The View peaked ages ago, but I still can't see them inviting Kate back to co-host.

Jane said...

Bucks Co man, Daniel Stoltzfus, "gifted" his young daughter to a man when she was 14. I'm not in Bucks all that often but I think that's a common name/family there?

http://abc7ny.com/news/police-girl-gifted-to-sex-assault-suspect;-12-girls-in-home/1390448/

Tucker's Mom said...

Stoltzfus is a common Amish name. Feasterville isn't exactly back woods country, either. It's suburban and mainstream.
Jeez.
These parents should have any minors taken, if still living at home.
Unbelievable.

PA Dutch Mom said...

Stoltzfus is a common Amish name. Feasterville isn't exactly back woods country, either. It's suburban and mainstream.
Jeez.
These parents should have any minors taken, if still living at home.
Unbelievable.

&&&&&&&&&&&&

I just read that article on WGAL.com. This guy and those parents should be snipped so there's no chance of ever breeding again.

Stoltzfus is as common here as Smith and Jones. There's a Stoltzfus at every turn in the road.

Joanie ‏@yankeefortytwo 4h4 hours ago
@Kateplusmy8 Love your cookbook! Just wondering--does your pizza dough need to rise before using?

Add a cup of liquid Viagra. That should get things moving along pretty quickly.

Tucker's Mom said...

Add a cup of liquid Viagra. That should get things moving along pretty quickly.
*******
Eh, just show the dough Kate's timeline and things will, ahem, expand.

jamezvader1194 said...

@Admin 180 I don't think anyone believes Milo has any contact with Kate.I know some here joke about it but in all seriousness,i can't image Kate giving a crap about whatever it is Milo or msgoody say to her.But honestly who knows.

Carole said...

What were we just saying about inadequate signage at Disney?

"Disney Installing Gator Signs, Barriers Following Attack on Boy"

"The signs mention that there are "alligators and snakes in area," to stay away from the water and warn not to feed the wildlife. Previous signage warned not to swim in the water, but did not mention gators."

http://abc7ny.com/news/disney-installing-gator-signs-barriers-following-attack-on-boy/1390516/

PA Dutch Mom said...

@Admin 180 I don't think anyone believes Milo has any contact with Kate.I know some here joke about it but in all seriousness,i can't image Kate giving a crap about whatever it is Milo or msgoody say to her.But honestly who knows.

&&&&&&&&&&&

I think that she does have contact with Kate. She probably pesters her unmercifully. Whether Kate responds or ignores her is anyone's guess.

TLC stinks said...

Kate got her chance and blew it for The View. She won't be asked to co-host again.

Over In TFW's County said...

Kate! Your search for the perfect guy is over. This one is just your type, and he's in Reading!

Carmelo Rolon ‏@crolon75 16m16 minutes ago
@Kateplusmy8 hi Kate wat u been up to today.

Over In TFW's County said...

I remember Milo's narcissistic rants on Kate's birthday. I wonder if anyone got screen shots of those tweets. Kravitz was scary. If ever there was a time for Kate to call local law enforcement for extra security patrol, that was it.

Somewhere In Time said...

Speaking of narcissism, I was watching a "Most Evil" episode, "Egocentric Killers," where narcissism is discussed. It was stated that a narcissist is parasitic, ruthless, exploitative, vain, detached and callous.

This is a good Cliff Notes version of the narcissist and parental alienation...

"Parental Alienation is symptomatic of a highly conflicted divorce when a narcissistic parent's world turns upside down and the narcissist tries to regain equilibrium by turning children against the targeted spouse. Thus, the alienator who lacks empathy uses narcissistic characteristics to regain power and control by manipulating people to satisfy their needs. The abuser uses tactics flowing from their narcissistic personality to separate the child from the targeted parent thus inflicting severe suffering on the alienated parent. It is child abuse as well as abuse of the alienated parent. Those of us who have been targeted by an alienating spouse or ex-spouse will recognize the symptoms of a narcissistic personality. It is just unfortunate that we did not recognize the traits and act accordingly before the onset of abuse."

http://www.parent-alienate.com/narcissistic.html

jamezvader1194 said...

@PA Dutch Mom If Kate does respond to her,i image it's nothing more then a thank you or a hello.It be pretty weird if Kate had chats with her and messed up if Kate tells her any secrets regarding custody or the kids relationship with their father.

Somewhere In Time said...

Kate! Your search for the perfect guy is over. This one is just your type, and he's in Reading!

Carmelo Rolon ‏@crolon75 16m16 minutes ago
@Kateplusmy8 hi Kate wat u been up to today.

---

Noooooo!! I want him. He's mine, all mine! He looks so friendly!

Somewhere In Time said...

From the Church Women...

Barbie Jean Sayre
@barbiejeansayre
Carla use to go all the time for she was get n paid off her disable check for them "ceasers" she has couldn't afford air, bread,, NOTHIN

I am almost afraid to ask this, but what is a ceasers?

I've seen Carla mentioned several times. Does anyone who follows this know who Carla is? Foxy?

fidosmommy said...

Carla use to go all the time for she was get n paid off her disable check for them "ceasers" she has couldn't afford air, bread,, NOTHIN

I am almost afraid to ask this, but what is a ceasers?

*********
I don't know, but my sister used to say she was going to the grocery store to get robbed. Maybe ceasers is supposed to be seizers, as in robbers? I know it's a stretch, it was just Sis' way of commenting on the high price of food and this sounded similar to me.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

People have been posting on twitter other gator signs from various other establishments. Most of them are much better, providing specific information that gators are in the water and that they can attack.

The general feeling seems to be Disney was reluctant to put "gators" on a sign for fear of ruining the nice family friendly resort vibe with bad news about dangerous animals.

My first reaction on this was recklessness on the part of the family resulted in this and that you can't legislate away stupidity. But now that we have a lot more facts I think Disney really screwed this up. I'd love to see how they risk-cost analyzed this one before this all went down.

ncgirl said...

Could "ceasers' be seizures? I don't think it's ceasers palace. lol

Seredipity said...

My first reaction on this was recklessness on the part of the family resulted in this and that you can't legislate away stupidity. But now that we have a lot more facts I think Disney really screwed this up. I'd love to see how they risk-cost analyzed this one before this all went down.

-----

I think both are at fault. You don't let a two-year-old "wade" in one or two feet of water at night. You just don't. At least *I* don't, but then again, I'm a Momma Grizzly. If you post signs, could they really be seen at night, especially on a fairly large beach? I don't know,

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...



I think both are at fault. You don't let a two-year-old "wade" in one or two feet of water at night. You just don't. At least *I* don't, but then again, I'm a Momma Grizzly.


&&&&


You don't let a two year old wade in water without a close eye on them, that's a problem.

I don't have a problem with the night dip itself. At 9 o'clock at night in June it's still just dusk and you can still see clearly. We often went for late night dips around 9pm growing up in either the Great Lake I grew up on, or the pool. You don't go out too far and you always have an adult right with you. It's a nice cool down, lowering of your body temp before bed so you can sleep in all the humidity. We didn't have air conditioning. There was nothing unsafe about it as long as everyone is careful. No one ever got hurt. But then there weren't alligators in these waters or anything that could hurt you.

This issue is they let him wade in what they likely thought was a gator-free manmade pond because despite numerous signs at other areas warning of gators, this particular pond had no such signs. A reasonable person could assume gators are somehow sectioned off from this. That's Disney's fault for not being clear this was an active wildlife arena.

Blowing In The Wind said...

This issue is they let him wade in what they likely thought was a gator-free manmade pond because despite numerous signs at other areas warning of gators, this particular pond had no such signs. A reasonable person could assume gators are somehow sectioned off from this. That's Disney's fault for not being clear this was an active wildlife arena.

--------------

There may not have been gator warnings, but from what I remember about the Grand Floridian, there are no swimming signs posted at the lagoon. That means, don't go into the water. I remember the last time I was there, I plopped my chair down at the edge of the water. It was a hot, humid day and the water looked so cooling and inviting, but I figured there was a reason there were no swimming signs posted. I was thinking snakes, not gators.

Deliverence said...

Seredipity said... 19

I think both are at fault. You don't let a two-year-old "wade" in one or two feet of water at night. You just don't. At least *I* don't, but then again, I'm a Momma Grizzly. If you post signs, could they really be seen at night, especially on a fairly large beach? I don't know,



From a fellow Momma Grizzly, I agree with you. There's enough blame to go around.

I do believe that Disney avoided using the word alligator in their signage; however, based on 45 YEARS of no alligator attacks I can understand the reasoning behind the decision to avoid it. Posting of signs merely would release them from any responsibility. There's no guarantee the sign would be noticed. Disney's bad not to predict ALL possible catastrophic situations than could be avoided by signage.

Disney is a multi-billion dollar corporation however, and if they make a mistake they get sued. They can afford it.

Don't think that my heart doesn't go out to the parents. Their lives are destroyed and they don't need to be castigated.

When you think about it, the only ones who will benefit are the attorneys, of course. I bet Saul would agree.

Deliverence said...

"This issue is they let him wade in what they likely thought was a gator-free manmade pond"

Probably not a good argument. "Gator-free" implies they knew there were gators around. If they knew that, a lot more responsibility rests on their shoulders.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

ridian, there are no swimming signs posted at the lagoon. That means, don't go into the water.

%%%%

See to me, no swimming means no swimming. Not, no TOUCHING the water. And, a no swimming sign is not enough with gators, because it's been very clearly explained in the past few days by biologists that they can attack you even if you are ON shore as long as you are close enough to the water. This child need not have even been in the water to be taken, he could have been simply playing at the water's edge in full compliance with the "no swimming" sign. So, no swimming really isn't sufficient when you know how gators stalk their small prey. Someone pointed out that one of the most common reasons for no swimming signs is "no lifeguard on duty." Therefore a lot of people interpret no swimming signs as "swim at your own risk" signs and swim anyway and it's fine. Also it was pointed out there are beach chairs at the water. You don't put out swimming type items and then turn around and expect no one to touch the water.

Here, there are no swimming signs after a big storm because of pollution drainage. You're not going to DIE if you swim, but it's not good for you. But you're certainly not going to die if you just want to dip your feet in or stand at the shoreline. No swimming is just a very different sign than a "gators" sign. Very different.

The fact that it was a man made lagoon at a resort is a very important fact. Everyone going to Flordia should assume gators are around. But it's perfectly reasonable to assume (before THIS incident anyway!) there wouldn't be gators in a man-make water on a private property, that they must have some way to section it off or remove them. Much like I wouldn't expect a shark in there either.

We are learning a lot more about gators after this, like that they are impossible to remove. Relocation doesn't work neither does euthanising them. They come back and in some ways are a nuisance animal much like the skunks at my place. I don't think most people can say they honestly knew how difficult gators are to keep out of even man made waters until this terrible incident. As other people on Twitter have posted, there are other much better signs at other establishments in the area that very clearly explain not only that the water is very dangerous but WHY it is. They WHY is important for people to make an informed decision about their safety, and all no swimming signs should say why--sharks, jellyfish, alligators, riptides, no lifeguard, storm drainage, rocks, heavy waves. An experienced swimmer might chance it with a riptide, but choose not to swim if it's sharks. He has a right to know WHY he is being warned.

It seems to me what the majority of other places are doing to warn people should have been a red flag to Disney they were not doing enough. Also, this is not their first attack, 30 years ago an eight year old was attacked at a Disney camp.

I think this family is going to win big either in a settlement or trial. The only thing they did wrong was turn their backs for a moment. You would expect that to result in a small child swallowing a mouthful of water and coughing it up and you get a big wake up call you have got to WATCh a two year old. But you would not expect the child to die from a gator because you looked at fireworks for a moment.

fidosmommy said...

I once saw a fountain with No Swimming in the Fountain signs all around it. I thought that was funny - swimming in a fountain??? But sure enough, there were people sitting on its edge with their feet dangling in. Children and teens were running around in it. But they weren't actually swimming. To them, swimming apparently meant sitting or lying in the water. To the security guards who kept telling people to get out, they were swimming. Definitions are important.

Tucker's Mom said...

Here, there are no swimming signs after a big storm because of pollution drainage. You're not going to DIE if you swim, but it's not good for you. But you're certainly not going to die if you just want to dip your feet in or stand at the shoreline. No swimming is just a very different sign than a "gators" sign. Very different.
*****
I give the example of the OBX when there are riptides. No Swimming flags/ signs are posted, but you can wade in up to your shins and splash water on you to cool off.
Walking along the water's edge isn't dangerous.

Depending on people's experience, they have different levels of knowledge and understanding about water danger, be it the water or the critters in it.

Tucker's Mom said...

There may not have been gator warnings, but from what I remember about the Grand Floridian, there are no swimming signs posted at the lagoon. That means, don't go into the water
*******
"DO NOT ENTER WATER" means don't go into the water.
When the risk is alligators, vs. pollution or bacteria, where the difference is death vs. diarrhea, you'd better spell it out!
The level of risk one assume escalates by orders of magnitude when the sign makes it clear the the REASON you cannot swim in gators.

Tucker's Mom said...

Deliverence said... 23
"This issue is they let him wade in what they likely thought was a gator-free manmade pond"

Probably not a good argument. "Gator-free" implies they knew there were gators around. If they knew that, a lot more responsibility rests on their shoulders.
*****
I assume bodies of water near me are gator-free because they are gator free.
I think we'll find out this Nebraska couple had no idea of the danger of gators. Many people think of them as only in the everglades and coastal, not in the middle of Florida in a man-made body of water.

Tucker's Mom said...

This issue is they let him wade in what they likely thought was a gator-free manmade pond because despite numerous signs at other areas warning of gators, this particular pond had no such signs. A reasonable person could assume gators are somehow sectioned off from this. That's Disney's fault for not being clear this was an active wildlife arena.
*****
A quick Google search turns up pictures and footage of kids in the water and at the water's edge at the Grand Floridian. Check out this footage a grandmother took of her 3-year old grandson who LOVES to run along the water in the exact spot the 2-year old was snatched.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/orlando-nurse-posts-pic-grandson-beach-gator-attacked/story?id=39874277

This kid is frolicking at what looks like sundown, well within the reach of any gator who could easily bolt out of the water and grab him.
She said playing on the beach is his favorite thing.

JoyinVirginia said...

Commenting on alligators: we went to Hilton Head SC last month. LOTS of alligators there! And signs everywhere, saying something like "danger alligators. SC statue no. 123 forbids feeding or harassing alligators". Something like that. Every pond had an alligator. And every pond off the main road in the tourist area we were in, had a fence completely or partially around it. But still accidents happen. One family lost a big dog in March.
http://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/article68400362.html

foxy said...

Somewhere in time 15....apparently Carla is a friend and she is taken advantage of on a regular basis. These other ladies make her take them shopping, make her shovel the sidewalk in the winter, go get cigarettes for them and basically just use her. They often say I will make Carla do it. I think "ceasers" is seizures if she is on disability. By the same token, if they can't get hold of her they worry.

Tucker's Mom said...

. I think "ceasers" is seizures if she is on disability.
***********
I hope she's taking peanut butter balls for that!

Tucker's Mom said...

One family lost a big dog in March.
http://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/article68400362.html
June 18, 2016 at 4:15 AM
******
It gives me pause to think about moving to some places like SC and FL, because we'll always have doggies.

Formerly Duped said...

'caesers'= kaisers (rolls) perhaps?

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

http://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/article68400362.html

The three recent attacks mentioned in that article all occurred at the water's edge. No one was swimming or even dipping their toes in. One was a dog taking a drink, one was someone fishing at the edge of the water and the third was a woman walking her dogs along the shore. A no swimming sign wouldn't have prevented those attacks because no one was swimming. And I daresay this gator was stalking this boy as prey and could have grabbed him from shore too even if HE never went in the water either.

I think my first thought about a "no swimming" sign at a manmade lagoon would mean not chlorinated, and no lifeguard. If I'm out in a beach chair all afternoon and it's hot, I can't say I wouldn't dip my toes in before heading back to the hotel. They had beach chairs lined up all along the shore!! You don't put a beach chair at the threshold of a gator's habitat. That is completely misleading.

We have a lagoon near me steps from the ocean and although it's not dangerous, they don't want you going in the water because they don't want you to disrupt the natural habitat. There are boardwalks with ropes and no easy way to get down to the water itself. There are no beach chairs or other items that imply this is beach water to enjoy. There are benches for sitting, because it's more of a park atmosphere, not a place to bring your swimsuit.

You do have to be clear to people about what you intend they do or not do, within reason. If they want to go beyond what's safe that's at their own risk, but if you don't explain the risk in the first place, a guest can't make an informed decision.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

The "warning gators" signs at numerous other places bodes really, really bad for Disney. Not good.

If a guest, especially an out of towner, encountered numerous "no gators" signs on his travels, and then suddenly hits upon a body of water in which there is no sign warning of gators, one might assume oh good, finally a body of water that doesn't have gators in it. Let's take a dip!

A reasonable person might assume by law an establishment has to warn of gators if they have them. Since this one didn't, must mean no gators.

It's really just a tragedy of errors that were bound to lead to serious injury or death eventually.

I don't think Disney has much of an argument that gator attacks are rare so they don't have to warn of freak accidents. I would propose that gator attacks are rare BECAUSE of good signage at other places. The question is how many alligator attacks would they be if everyone's sign simply said "no swimming."

This case is going to be a perfect law school tort case to study. It is a perfect storm.

Rainbowsandunicorns said...

This case is going to be a perfect law school tort case to study. It is a perfect storm.

-----
-----

Yes, it will be a good study in liability. If Disney should have had a gator warning sign posted, how many of them, where, and how far spaced apart? Should the signs be lighted so if people are talking a stroll on the beach at night they could see them? Where does it end? Should cruise ships have signs posted not to hang over the railings because in rare instances, a rogue wave might take you out? Should seafood restaurants have signs posted at the entrance to warn people that some fish might have bones and they could choke? Should hotels have signed posted by the elevators that they could malfunction and if you are claustrophic, to take the stairs? Far-out there examples, but there is a liability question that needs to be studied, especially in a litigious society.

I don't know. Exactly how far should an establishment go in warning people for what most folks would consider common sense? You're in Florida. There are alligators and there are snakes, and if you have a very young child, you hold on to that child and not let him/her wade in water when clearly there are no swimming signs posted. There must be a reason for those signs and you don't ignore them.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...



I don't know. Exactly how far should an establishment go in warning people for what most folks would consider common sense? Y



&&&&

Trust me I'm not really big on a bunch of warning signs. Hot coffee, caution packaging is a choking hazard, slippery when wet are all signs that assume you don't have basic common sense.

The key difference here though, and why this tragedy has become so fascinating from a legal perspective, is how misleading the whole operation was. They HAD a sign, but the sign only suggested no swimming, which as we've discussed carries all kinds of different meanings without specifying more. From the beach chairs to the man-made lagoon to lots of other guests allowing children near shore without the establishment saying anything, to most other establishments warning of gators thus creating the reasonable belief that if there are gators the standard practice in the area is to tell you so--this was different.

There's another element here too, and that is that it's Disney. You would assume Disney has all its ducks in a row with making sure you are safe. If this was a smaller operation, cheaper, more rinky-dink, I might not trust the safety of it as much as I would when you slap "Disney" on it. That name is powerful, and it comes with a lot of responsibility. They may be held to a higher standard by the very fact that they have put themselves out there as a higher standard and asked people to pay for the privilege.

I'm not sold on gators in this particular lagoon being common sense. I'm just not.

foxy said...

Tuckers mom 32....why would Carla take peanut butter balls for seizures or even ceasers? I am missing something here. Thanks.

TLC stinks said...

I hope Disney gets its clock cleaned. I cannot imagine the horror of watching your toddler dragged underwater by a gator. I totally believe their signage was misleading. Dipping your toes in water, and his father was with him, is not swimming and it could have happened without the child even being in the water. Gators are quick. The parents have lost their child. They have suffered enough without strangers being judgmental.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

I haven't seen this comment anywhere, so I'll make it. If the Orlando shooting tragedy hadn't happened, I think the gator story would've garnered 100 times more attention and outrage. Disney is probably thanking their lucky stars that this horrifying incident (for which they're being held accountable by many) has been overshadowed in the news by ongoing coverage of the shooting story and its aftermath.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...



I haven't seen this comment anywhere, so I'll make it. If the Orlando shooting tragedy hadn't happened, I think the gator story would've garnered 100 times more attention and outrage. Disney is probably thanking their lucky stars that this horrifying incident (for which they're being held accountable by many) has been overshadowed in the news by ongoing coverage of the shooting story and its aftermath.

&&&

I agree, though thankfully it is getting a lot of attention anyway.

This is about so much more than the incident that happened. This is about a large company that claims so much to be about children and their happiness getting exposed for the truth of what goes on.

I have long had a distrust for Disney. My first real negative encounter with them was watching college friends take part in their "intern" program which promised a wonderful summer and great resume booster to launch one's "acting career" when in fact you put on a costume all summer in 100 degree heat and humidity and walked around the park greeting kids. Even then many of us college kids recognized it for the scam that it was.

I think this has really exposed Disney for what they really are, a bottom line, risk-cost assessment. You could argue all big companies are like that, but I disagree. I don't think all big companies are lie that. There is a lot of information out there around the web about Disney and their misdeeds, but they have done an excellent job of crushing any negative speech about them.

Over In TFW's County said...

I hope Disney gets its clock cleaned. I cannot imagine the horror of watching your toddler dragged underwater by a gator.

++++++++++++

From what I have read on various sites, he wasn't dipping his toes into the water. He was in one to two FEET of water, and for a small toddler, that's deep. I stopped reading reports, though, because the horror and sadness of it all was just too much for me.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...



From what I have read on various sites, he wasn't dipping his toes into the water. He was in one to two FEET of water, and for a small toddler, that's deep. I stopped reading reports, though, because the horror and sadness of it all was just too much for me.


&&&&



That fact is becoming less and less important, since we've now been told by biologists that it doesn't matter if the kid is in a couple feet of water, a couple inches, or standing on shore not in the water at all--the danger from this gator was all the same. Even if everyone obeyed the no swimming sign, the risk of horrific death was still there as long as they were close to shore.

Over And Out said...

Efimova Alexandra ‏@SashaDoubleMam 4h4 hours ago
@Kateplusmy8 Oh Kate how do you find best? Every day to Wake up and fight?

----
There are times when it's wise not to use the google translator!

Over And Out said...

So now that we know that the sheeple approve of her new avatar and have fed her ego with adoration, do we all break into a chorus of "Can't Take My Eyes Off Of You?" Four-part harmony, anyone?

Pardon the way that I stare
There's nothing else to compare
The sight of you leaves me weak
There are no words left to speak
But if you feel like I feel
Please let me know that is real
You're just too good to be true
I can't take my eyes off you

Anonymous said...

Over In TFW's County said... 43
I hope Disney gets its clock cleaned. I cannot imagine the horror of watching your toddler dragged underwater by a gator.

++++++++++++

From what I have read on various sites, he wasn't dipping his toes into the water. He was in one to two FEET of water, and for a small toddler, that's deep. I stopped reading reports, though, because the horror and sadness of it all was just too much for me.
*************************************
My god, this father WATCHED his child snatched by an alligator. Can we PLEASE stop with the implied blame on the parents, the second-guessing, etc.? What purpose does it serve? I can guarantee you that this poor man will blame himself for the rest of his life and it will probably destroy him. Disney may well deserve to get their clock cleaned, but a$100M settlement from Disney won't change what happened for this family. Their lives are ruined.

Susan1956 said...

Carla use to go all the time for she was get n paid off her disable check for them "ceasers" she has couldn't afford air, bread,, NOTHIN
**************************
I'll take a crack at it.

Carla used to go all the time (to ??-- bingo?)because she was getting a disability check due to having seizures. Before she started getting the disability check, she couldn't afford air, bread, NOTHING.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

My god, this father WATCHED his child snatched by an alligator. Can we PLEASE stop with the implied blame on the parents, the second-guessing, etc.? What purpose does it serve? I can guarantee you that this poor man will blame himself for the rest of his life and it will probably destroy him. Disney may well deserve to get their clock cleaned, but a$100M settlement from Disney won't change what happened for this family. Their lives are ruined.

&&&

I know how upsetting this is and I do agree with you. They were talking about this on KFI in conjunction with the boy who fell into the gorilla pen. Lots of parents were calling in talking about all the times they turned their back on their little ones for one second and something crazy happened. Ran into the street, climbed up a tall ladder, locked himself in a room. Every time it was fine, but it gave them all a big scare. The end result of the conversation is kids get into things when you turn your back for one second, and it happens to even the best of parents.

It's not realistic to have a hand on your child's shoulder at all times. Nor is it healthy for them. A two year old does need freedom to run around a bit, even splash a bit, and explore, without a mama grizzly right there breathing down his neck. Up until this incident it seemed like lots of parents were letting their little ones run around in this lagoon area without being right next to them. Look at the grandmother's video of her grandson where he ran off without her. The parents were clearly a reasonable distance away, as they were able to notice the alligator snatching him and go after it and wrestle it. It's not like they went back to their hotel room or out to eat and left him there, which incidentally was what was going on when Madeleine McCann was kidnapped in Portugal. Her parents took some criticism for that, and I happen to think what they did is way worse, you NEVER leave children that young home alone (what if there's a fire???) but I think eventually people realized a dumb mistake shouldn't cost you your child and that lots of parents have made a dumb mistake.

Yes, he shouldn't have been in the water, but you just wouldn't expect a tragedy of this magnitude to result from a momentary lapse from the parents. It's not a case of you get what you get. That's not fair. We as a society need to account for momentary lapses in parenting.

Under the logic of parents need to just watch their kids at all times and be mama grizzlies, we don't need fences, or signs, or boardwalks, or kiddie pools, or anything at all to keep kids away from danger, because it's all on the parents to watch their kids. That obviously is an absurd notion. A parent should be able to go out with their child out and about and breathe a little bit without fearing that unless they hold onto them their kid is going to fall off a cliff or get eaten by a wild animal or any host of dangers that establishments should place protections against.

Another important fact coming out, the resort knowingly let their guests feed the gators. All the biologists are saying that is SOOO dangerous. That you are actively teaching the gators to associate humans as a food source. A huge no-no. Then you parade humans right in front of their feeding grounds? The more I hear about it, the more I think the folks who signed off on this at Disney are outright lunatics and that this was absolutely going to happen if not this week, eventually. Without a doubt.

Sherry Baby said...


Under the logic of parents need to just watch their kids at all times and be mama grizzlies, we don't need fences, or signs, or boardwalks, or kiddie pools, or anything at all to keep kids away from danger, because it's all on the parents to watch their kids. That obviously is an absurd notion. A parent should be able to go out with their child out and about and breathe a little bit without fearing that unless they hold onto them their kid is going to fall off a cliff or get eaten by a wild animal or any host of dangers that establishments should place protections against.

__________________
This is a two-year-old, not a nine or ten year old child. You don't let a child that young wander about, free to explore, without keeping an eye on him every minute. Look at Adam Walsh.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


This is a two-year-old, not a nine or ten year old child. You don't let a child that young wander about, free to explore, without keeping an eye on him every minute. Look at Adam Walsh.


&&&&

But that's the thing, it doesn't appear the parents DID let him go off by himself. Unless we have video of it the only way we know is what we have been told. We have been told the parents attacked the alligator and tried to grab him out of its mouth.

If they were so close to the water they could immediately see the incident and attack the alligator, which they did, they were obviously very close to their child. Close enough to rescue him from KNOWN dangers like drowning. Alligators are incredibly fast and are not going to wait around for parents to run from long distances away to try to get their child out of his mouth. It's clear they were actually right there.

One need not be in the actual water to watch your child properly. Every parent has been at the water's edge at some point with their kid in the water. Lifeguards are usually not in the actual water when they are watching children--there is nothing wrong with that in and of itself. I get it, he shouldn't have been so deep at his age, but who is to say they would not have noticed two seconds later he went past wading, and scolded him and brought him inside. He's two, they go beyond boundaries.

I am struggling to grasp how their parenting as anything but normal care. Was it perfect, no, was it on the more lax side, yes, but lax parenting does not result in DEATH and if anything it can promote safety by raising more independent capable children who are able to get out of and avoid dangers on their own.

CPS would never file on something like this. They understand a parent cannot be held to impossible standards or they would fall over from exhaustion. Making yourself absolutely mad with exhaustion because you're by your child's side every second, even a two year old, is just not good for the child OR yourself. They didn't do anything wrong. This is all Disney's fault.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

By the way I was trying to find the police report on the gator attack, since that usually features the most eye witness account and direct statements instead of just summaries but the media.

No success, but I did find a statement form the sheriff indicating it was possibly just one foot of water and the boy was absolutely NOT swimming, but just playing at the edge of the water.

Not the two or more reported by other sources or "swimming" reported by other sources.

That's a big difference when the kids is two. And a big difference in how far away you can be from the kid while still being a safe enough distance to immediately be there if he needed help--which they were.

CC said...

They had their eye on their child. He was apparently even within reach.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

I found several reports indicating they were within arm's reach of the child. Their two children actually, both their 4 and 2 year old were at the water's edge.

What more are they supposed to do, strap their bodies to theirs?

They are a hardworking upper-middle class family from the midwest with no history of abuse or neglect and no reason to think they don't take water safety seriously.

Also now this? There were lifeguards around! The parents called one to come over and help! Don't swim, but we're posting lifeguards? Disney, COME ON.

Lynne In RI said...

Sherry (50): "This is a two-year-old, not a nine or ten year old child. You don't let a child that young wander about, free to explore, without keeping an eye on him every minute. Look at Adam Walsh. "

((((((((((((((

I agree. A two-year-old is still in diapers, at least most of them are. When you become a parent, your whole perspective changes, and unless you have children of your own, it may be hard to understand that you have to watch these young children like a hawk, especially at that age.

A friend of mine had a young child. The family was at a barbecue in the back yard. The father turned his back for a split second to flip some burgers and the little boy fell into the pool and they couldn't resuscitate him. One can call it hovering, or being a mama grizzly or papa grizzly or whatever, but with kids that young, you don't let them out of your sight for a minute, and if the signs say "no swimming" there has to be a reason. You don't even let them wade in the water.

I'm just not sure how logical it is to post a gator warning, or where the signs would be placed that they are in sight of everyone, especially tourists who may go to Florida for the first time and not be aware of the wildlife in those waters. There will always be some who ignore warnings and think that nothing could ever happen to them or their children.

Lynne In RI said...


Also now this? There were lifeguards around! The parents called one to come over and help! Don't swim, but we're posting lifeguards? Disney, COME ON.

))))))))))))))))))))

Are you sure that the lifeguards weren't stationed at the pool?

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


Also now this? There were lifeguards around! The parents called one to come over and help! Don't swim, but we're posting lifeguards? Disney, COME ON.

))))))))))))))))))))

Are you sure that the lifeguards weren't stationed at the pool?


&&&&

They said they posted lifeguards around to keep people out of the water. It's unclear if the lifeguard near the incident could be perceived by a reasonable person to be a lifeguard for that part of the lagoon.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

When you become a parent, your whole perspective changes, and unless you have children of your own, it may be hard to understand

&&&

Then why did this happen to these parents, did their perspective somehow NOT change when they became parents??? By all accounts they are a very nice upstanding family, how did they miss the "perspective changed" boat when they gave birth to their two children?

Is it there are really all these neglectful parents out there, or is that just part of normal parenting, turning your back for one second? The fact is it's not, it IS reasonable to look away for one second assuming you have your child confined to an otherwise safe area, and the vast majority of the time you're not being a "bad" parent if you take reasonable precautions and generally keep an eye on the kids.

A father has to flip burgers so the family can eat, parents have more than one child to attend to, the world is full of distractions. By your logic, all parents should throw away their iphone, because even looking at your phone for one second is turning away from your child. Let's be honest, staring at your child all day 24 hours a day and keeping them within two feet of you all day 24 hours a day is simply not possible, and kind of creepy. I can promise you daycares and schools are not staring at all their toddlers like that. But what they DO do is make sure they are in a confined, safe place. At a certain point you have to accept that blinking is going to happen.

How old was the young child that drowned? It makes better sense to close off the pool with gates available to protect children, and let them run around a bit while you flip burgers and look on. The child is safe from the pool, and you are freed up to cook dinner. The problem is not the flipping of burgers for a split second in that tragic case. The problem is a child with easy access to a pool. That being said, I'm surprised a child who was in the water for a split second drowned. Basic CPR and mouth to mouth should be able to easily revive a few swallows of water and you go on with your day without even a hospital visit. Almost everyone with a pool has had to slap a few children's backs and cough up the water and you just go right on swimming! Children can come back from several minutes of drowning and be fine. Did no one know first aid? That's a problem too. It does you no good to watch your child like a hawk if you don't bother to learn basic first aid. It costs $20 to take a course at the Y, I did it.

For all intents and purposes the parents WERE watching him like a hawk, so this is a moot point anyway.

It has nothing to do with being a parent or not being a parent. Anyone can understand this. It's kind of insulting to suggest a non-parent can't understand a two year old needs protection and must be watched. But if all parents watched children like "hawks", ready to yank them away by the arm at the slightest danger, children would never skin their knees, get a mouthful of water, fall off a swing, or slip on a wet spot. In other words, they would never learn to deal with their world. That's not wise parenting either, and can lead to tragic results in its own right--in that a child is fully unprepared to deal with any obstacles.

You know what would make these parents neglectful? If their child drowned. But they are not neglectful because a freak accident happened. Would you say the parents neglected him if a meteor fell on his head, something went wrong with the wiring in the lighting and the water electrocuted him? What about if a crazy lunatic came by at that moment and shot him? How are you supposed to foresee all these dangers? You can only foresee the expected and guard against that. If these parents were simply TOLD to expect gators, they may have made a very responsible choice not to let him go near the water. That's the entire point, they didn't have all the information.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

There will always be some who ignore warnings and think that nothing could ever happen to them or their children.

&&&&

That's true. And that's different. Those parents are being stupid, and neglectful. If something happens to their child, they are to blame.

But if you never post the warnings in the first place, you're not even giving parents a CHANCE to make a good choice for their children. It would be akin to opening an elevator door without an elevator there, and then blaming a parent who guides their child right inside to their death. Without a sign saying out of order don't use, you didn't even give the parent a CHANCE.

These parents might have made a very different choice for their child that night if they were warned about the ACTUAL dangers. Without even giving them a chance to redo it with the right signs there, I don't think anyone has any business criticizing them.

Fleecing The Sheeple said...

Those BOTS on Kate's TL really are enamored with BUTTS!

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

They have to be using photoshop to make those butts look bigger. What a world.

fidosmommy said...

Re: New Twitter picture. She looks positively anemic.
All washed out. Well, at least she isn't orange any more.

CC said...

Lynn in RI

I couldn't disagree with you any more.

A toddler around an open pool should be wearing a proper floatation vest if the parent isn't going to be in the water with them and watching them every second.

Unless it's just a wading pool. And the parent is sitting there with them always watching them at the water's edge.

Any body of water that a child can fall into is a safety hazard. Pool parties and BBQs is not a place for a child who doesn't know how to swim. My kids were never allowed to take their vests off by an open pool or inside the pool fence.

That's not what happened at the beach. The father was there watching his child. Within arms reach. Even if you turn to look at your other child for a second you wouldn't expect an alligator to come up and grab your child if you have no clue there could be alligators in the water.

And no swimming is not the same as no wading. The resort was FULLY AWARE that young children were ankle or knee deep in the water playing. If alligators are a danger then they should have warned them of the risk.

I've been to Disney resorts and parks and had no idea alligator on the property were possible.

CC said...

Sherry said
You don't let a child that young wander about, free to explore, without keeping an eye on him every minute. Look at Adam Walsh. "

I agree! However, that's not what happened at the Grand Floridian. The child wasn't wandering around with no one watching him.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


https://www.parentmap.com/article/my-daughter-almost-drowned

Even paranoid helicopter mothers who exhaust themselves keeping eagle eyes on their kids can find their kids getting in trouble right in front of them, much like the little Graves boy got in trouble right in front of his parents. There's just no way to complete eliminate accidents with kids unless you don't want to let them be kids. This mother shouldn't be too hard on herself, she and her husband were doing the best they could around the pool, their daughter lost her bearings on a flotation device and they were there to rescue her. The worst thing that happened is she got a mouthful of water and a big scare. And maybe she learned something too, to not push herself more than she's really ready yet. That's not such a bad thing. Missteps, trial and error and wipe outs are how kids learn what their own personal boundaries are. If these parents never let their child experience the fear of finding her head under water, she might never appreciate the dangers of her limited swimming skills. And that's a horrible thing.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with letting a toddler wade in water with you right there, unless you have reason to believe there's something dangerous about it. They didn't.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Stephanie is looking to hook up with me again. Doesn't a pretty girl like her have plans for a Saturday night?

Sheepless In Seattle said...

FlimsyFlamsy said... 66
Stephanie is looking to hook up with me again. Doesn't a pretty girl like her have plans for a Saturday night?

------------

Yes, with you!

Sheepless In Seattle said...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with letting a toddler wade in water with you right there, unless you have reason to believe there's something dangerous about it. They didn't.

---------------

Two feet of water on a toddler is not wading! Wading is walking around in water that barely covers your feet.

CC said...


Sheepless in Seattle said...
Two feet of water on a toddler is not wading! Wading is walking around in water that barely covers your feet.
-----------------------

Wading is walking in water with your body partially covered by the water. It doesn't have to be ankle deep.

Based on news reports he was in "about" a foot of water, with his dad nearby.

A 2-year-old boy is an average of 34.5 inches tall, in the 50th percentile.

Based on that about 2/3 of his body was above the water.

We don't know all the exact details as of yet. He could have been in two feet of water, he could have been two feet tall... But based on what we do know right now, he was wading in about a foot of water.

Tucker's Mom said...

FlimsyFlamsy said... 66
Stephanie is looking to hook up with me again. Doesn't a pretty girl like her have plans for a Saturday night?
*******
Steph needs to meander over to Kate's timeline. Plenty of action there!
Re: Disney. I don't care if the parent let the kid's pinky toe get wet, or if he was in up to his ankles. They failed to warn people of the specific and well-known to them threat of alligators, and have let people wade in that lagoon for years.
The internet has evidence of that all over it.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

Wade is defined by the dictionary as walking in water. As long as your feet are touching the bottom, you are wading. I can't find any definition that defines it by the actual amount of water. It matters relative to the person. Therefore, a 6 foot tall person could wade in 5 feet water.

I'm not sure why people are stuck on the two feet of water thing. If his parents were right there, a toddler can safely be in two feet of water. The water is not the reason he was killed. The gator killed him. He could have been on shore, in one inch of water, one foot, two feet or 5 feet. It doesn't matter, any of that was unsafe if there is a gator around--his parents didn't even have a chance to make a good decision for him.

CC said...

I wish blogger had a Like button for comments. I'm just going to let Admin reply to all the Alligator comments. I agree with all her comments about it. Lol.

Deliverence said...

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said

Another important fact coming out, the resort knowingly let their guests feed the gators.

------

Where is this being reported and where is the alligator feeding taking place. If there are alligators around that are knowingly being fed by the tourists, (which is a stupid thing to do/allow) it doesn't sound like Disney is trying to keep alligators a secret.

Jamesvader1194 said...

I just want to say Happy Father's day to everyone here.Hope you all have a good father's day.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2016/06/did_people_feeding_the_orlando_alligators_lead_to_the_2_year_old_s_death.html


An employee spoke out and said guests would feed the gators. He has mysteriously been silenced, probably by his employer.

They were trying to keep the gator dangers on the down low because that's not Disney friendly. They let guests treat them like cute ducks to throw breadcrumbs too. They ignored complaints from employees about the feeding going on.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/17/disney-repeatedly-warned-about-ongoing-alligator-issues-reports-say.html

They have new signs and ropes up saying don't go near the water, danger snakes and gators. That's much better. Too late for Lane.

Warmth Of The Sun said...

Kate's timeline. Yes, it's a BUTT BOT Twitter page! I guess none of the fans, nor Kate herself, has clapped loudly enough to get those things removed. They remind me of the Tinkerbell Effect in Peter Pan. If you believe, clap your hands!

NJGal51 said...

@Kateplusmy8: Happy Fathers Day to ALL fathers out there... Including Shoka!
#Mak&Nanuq #BornApril19 #Surprise! http://twitter.com/Kateplusmy8/status/744574705210789888/photo/1
========
Well someone who shouldn't even have one dog now apparently has three!

Sad but true said...

New puppies! The big reveal is happening on K8's TL now in honor of "ALL fathers!" Two, ostensibly from Shoka. Hmmm, has she really had an unneutered male living on (and regularly escaping from) her property for the past six years? I am doubtful he's really the puppies' dad. I guess we're back to the whole "see how much K8 loves animals" nonsense.

I'm not seeing any kids in the photos, so maybe they're all at their dad's? Even as I type it, I'm not buying it.

Jane said...

NJGal51 said... 77
@Kateplusmy8: Happy Fathers Day to ALL fathers out there... Including Shoka!
#Mak&Nanuq #BornApril19 #Surprise! http://twitter.com/Kateplusmy8/status/744574705210789888/photo/1
========
Well someone who shouldn't even have one dog now apparently has three!
&&&&&&&&&&&

Guess TLC needed material for another episode and decided puppies would work.

Anonymous said...

Does the "ALL" include Jon?

bm

Kylie said...

IMO the alligator incident is a tragic, tragic accident. From all reports and indications, the father was right by his son. He could have been right there, with his eyes glued to his son and that gator got him anyway. They are that fast. I live in TX and there are gators everywhere. I don't go anywhere near their habitats. But going to Disney is a different proposition altogether. The happiest place on earth may be in gator land, but a body of water with beach chairs right down to the waters edge and a sandy beach and no signs about gators in that body of water does not cause parents to believe their child is in danger of an alligator attacking him. That's just ludicrous. I've seen people calling the family 'country bumpkins' because they are from Nebraska, as if that makes them somehow stupid. I am shocked by the cruelty of people sitting behind their anonymous computer screen and spouting such hateful, hurtful comments to 2 parents who have experienced the worst thing imaginable for their toddler. They did nothing wrong. They were there, they fought the beast and they lost. Gators are unbelievably fast. May God bless this family.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

The happiest place on earth may be in gator land, but a body of water with beach chairs right down to the waters edge and a sandy beach and no signs about gators in that body of water does not cause parents to believe their child is in danger of an alligator attacking him. That's just ludicrous. I've seen people calling the family 'country bumpkins' because they are from Nebraska, as if that makes them somehow stupid
$$$

The dad is a highly educated university of Nebraska grad, a top school. He has worked for prestigious companies like PayPal and is in marketing. They are upper middle class if they can even afford the resorts 500 a night price.

The hotel had just held a movie night at the shore, further encouraging guests to hang out at the water's edge. All this knowing guests were feeding the gators there.

Tucker's Mom said...

Well someone who shouldn't even have one dog now apparently has three!
&&&&&&&&&&&

Guess TLC needed material for another episode and decided puppies would work.
******
Yes and yes.
Very gorgeous puppies.

However, Kate's kids will ALL be 18/in college when those dogs are still around for years to come. Lots of luck with that.

Tucker's Mom said...

The hotel had just held a movie night at the shore, further encouraging guests to hang out at the water's edge. All this knowing guests were feeding the gators there.
******
It's a beach, for all intents and purposes. I wouldn't hesitate to walk along the salty ocean at sunset.
Plus, I have a salt-water beach mentality. What I KNOW, personally, is salt water seas and oceans. Never spent time at lake or any fresh water beaches. I might assume there's no difference in what I level of awareness should be.
Except for the time, when I was a little girl, my family took us to visit friend who had a house on the Chesapeake Bay. I got stung by jellies like crazy, so now I realize they could be anywhere!
In fact, just saw jellies swooshing around my BIL's dock in NJ!
No thank you!!!

TLC stinks said...

Geez. Puppies for a story line. No way she'll keep them.

TLC stinks said...

Nanuq looks like he has a new home already. Check out the background.

TLC stinks said...

Same for Mak. Subdivision homes in background. I knew she would not keep two more dogs!

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Bm (#80), ha, I had the same thought. And did she also just accidentally wish it to her own father? The poor schnook who seems to have been kicked to a very crowded curb because he didn't know how to help her?

Yes, it could be argued that perhaps she keeps her relationship with her parents personal, and away from her show and social media. But as I've said before, TFW doesn't do privacy. And if she could score some points in the public eye by sharing this down-low relationship, you can 't convince me she wouldn't seize that opportunity.

TLC stinks said...

It should be easy to prove guests were feeding the gators. If that's the case, that explains why the gators there have no fear of humans. Disney is in trouble. I thought it was weird when I saw a clip of a gator attempting to board a raft crowded with guests there. Very ungatorlike behavior.

Formerly Duped said...

I missed something! Where did these puppies come from and who on earth is the mom? Do they live with KATE??? Why isn't Shoka neutered? I can't tell from the background where they are- yikes! Cute pups!

Formerly Duped said...

Oh, I see. Thanks TLC. Was this intentional or not I wonder..it says #surprise. How could it be, when Shoka is in a gated property?

jamezvader1194 said...

@Formly Duped According to Kate,they were born on April 19 and are 8 weeks old.Funny Milo is asking the same question in regards to the MIA mother.If TLC stinks observation is true then they were for filming for an episode of Shoka's baby mama giving birth and are now living somewhere else.Im sure Shoka would of gotten neutered long ago if TLC didn't bring Kate back or either he'd not be with Kate.

Math Girl said...

With regard to the puppies:
Again, Kate chooses her words carefully. She may have bred Shoka (i.e., allowed the breeder to pick him up, breed him and return him) and considers the puppies "family" because they are related to Shoka. They may have come for a visit/filming opportunity.

I would be surprised and disappointed if the two pups are actually going to live at the compound. But then, I've been surprised before. With the pre-divorce-episode publicity, I thought they were going to announce marriage counseling or going on a couples retreat or moving (again), not an actual divorce.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Formerly Duped (#90) like me, you probably assumed that any male creature living with TFW eventually finds his manhood in her purse.

Formerly Duped said...

Thanks, James, Math Girl and lol Flimsy!!

Jamesvader1194 said...

I have to say,this announcement of the puppies isn't getting as much feedback as i thought it would.I would of thought this announcement would of gotten the pictures over 1,000 favorites but it seems it didn't.I was curious if a tabloid reported about it so i decided to look up Kate(Note i haven't looked up her name in months)and there hasn't been any new story about her since January.Not even one thing about the kids birthday or hers like they use to write about.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


I have to say,this announcement of the puppies isn't getting as much feedback as i thought it would.I would of thought this announcement would of gotten the pictures over 1,000 favorites but it seems it didn't



&&&&


Part of it was not very good photos, the other part of it was the vague details. She plays games, and it's old As others have asked, wtf is this about? People don't like being left in the dark. People like explanations even if it's just a simple one.

It sounds like she bred him. This woman has no business breeding her dog. And with all the foster animals who need homes out there, no one should be intentionally bringing extraneous dogs into the world. They're not even purebred. How does a purebred GS breeding result in a pup that looks like a golden? There is no point to any of this other than attention for her.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

This is a glaring example actually of her total ineptness in social media.

She should have mentioned this ages ago, when the bitch first got pregnant. She could build excitement and a following as we count down until the puppies. Then she could share pictures and videos all along from birth until now. Even if they are not in her custody she could have the breeders send her photos, most would be happy to.

Instead a full two months later it's, oh by the way something is happening that any joker can manage to get some "likes" over.

TLC stinks said...

The pups are definitely a storyline. Someone tweeted her and asked if we'd see them on tv and Kate replied yes. I feel from the photos that the pups are in new homes UNLESS those photos are at the breeder's home and Kate gets them at eight weeks when weaned. If anyone has no business owning a dog, it's Kate Gosselin. The only bright side if she does indeed take those puppies is that Shoka will have playmates.

We called it about her mating Shoka.

SarahK said...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with letting a toddler wade in water with you right there, unless you have reason to believe there's something dangerous about it. They didn't.

===

If there are no swimming signs posted, that means don't go into the water, for whatever reason. I would think that would be rather obvious, and there would be a reason to keep out. You read the sign; you stay out of the water. It's not rocket science.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

James (#96), I think another reason there was not much of a response is that it's Father's Day, and people are busy with their families. But of course Gladys jumped on to comment, because she has made TFW a priority in her life. Too bad she'll never realize those feelings are not reciprocated, nor even acknowledged for that matter.

Formerly Duped said...

Could redbird have chosen a new name? I miss her.

And I agree, Admin, about spaying and neutering being so important with all the homeless dogs in the world

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


If there are no swimming signs posted, that means don't go into the water, for whatever reason. I would think that would be rather obvious, and there would be a reason to keep out. You read the sign; you stay out of the water. It's not rocket science.



&&&&



&&&&

It's not rocket science that a good "no swimming" sign says why. This is how we do them here, this is how Australia does them, and that is how numerous other establishments in the Florida region do them. There are numerous reasons for no swimming that don't affect your personal safety or if it does, the risk is low enough that many people take the calculated risk.

For instance I gave the example of the no swimming advisories here after storms because of runoff into the ocean. You're not going to die by going in the water. If you want to go in and expose yourself to sewage that's your choice. Lifeguards will alert you of the warning but they won't call the police on you. But someone might make a very different choice to swim if they knew a no swimming sign has been posted due to a couple sharks just spotted. There's a difference in WHY. Why matters, big time.

Another example is no swimming due to rip tides. I have enough water knowledge to know that a couple of feet of wading won't get you caught in a riptide. I also know how to safely and easily get out of a riptide should I find myself in one. I would and have taken the risk of going into the water during riptide warnings, they happen often, and so have countless other people. Why matters.

And has been stated over and over, a no swimming sign does not adequately explain that it's dangerous even to be CLOSE to shore, as gators will leap several feet onto shore to grab their prey.

The new signs specify the risk of danger and rope off the water. That is how plenty of other establishments do it, Disney doesn't get a pass on this in the name of "not rocket science."

And speaking of rocket science, it's not rocket science that you don't let your rich guests feed the gators. Stupid, and also, terrible for the gators in so many ways. This boy's death is solely on their hands.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

Jane said... 64
Recommending a new documentary on OJ Simpson. I know… we just did this! But this one's different and very, very well done. It premiered on ABC and subsequent shows are on ESPN. What's different is that it puts the Simpson debacle in the context of the times - Rodney King, Eula Love, the riots, the negligence of the LAPD at that time - and also goes into OJ's early life. It's a great sociological and psychological study. http://espn.go.com/30for30/ojsimpsonmadeinamerica/

&&&&

Jane, thank you so much for recommending this. I started watching it out of order, and it's phenomenal in its minutia (which I like). I started watching part 3 and then stopped and started over on part 1.

Marcia Clark participated and Gil Garcetti and Mark Furhman. I appreciate their humbleness in willing to dive into how the heck he got away with this. Marcia in particular is a class act.

I knew the DV was bad but I did not realize how truly psycho he was, including arranging "spies" to infiltrate Nicole's inner circle and report back to him. That's nuts.

I had also not seen most of the crime scene photos and DV photos they had.

For true crime fans this is for you. For anyone interested in civil rights and race relations this is for you.

Seredipity said...

I don't know. I guess I am just a hopeless hovering helicopter parent. My little guy is two years old, on the short side, and two-feet of water would be waist deep on him. If the sign said "no swimming," I wouldn't let him go into the water and especially not at dusk or at night. But that's just me.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


I don't know. I guess I am just a hopeless hovering helicopter parent. My little guy is two years old, on the short side, and two-feet of water would be waist deep on him. If the sign said "no swimming," I wouldn't let him go into the water and especially not at dusk or at night. But that's just me


&&&&

It sounds like you wouldn't let him go in because you fear the water would be too deep for him, especially as he is on the short side. And for whatever reason don't feel comfortable supervising him yourself. That's perfectly reasonable and a good choice to you. But here's the rub, you're worried about the **drowning** risk, not the gator risk. And that's the whole point. These particular parents deemed themselves capable of watching their particular son in a couple feet of water to guard against drowning, and let him go in.

This is being confused again and again. The boy was killed by an alligator, not from drowning independent of the gator.

If the boy went in and due to parental neglect, drowned, that really would be on the parents. But that's not what happened. Something entirely different and unexpected happen, due to poor signage and negligence on behalf of the hotel.

It really isn't fair to confuse one danger with the other, or equate them as the same, with blame assigned equally.

Put another way, if there were no alligators in that lagoon as clearly the parents thought, he never would have died and would be enjoying father's day today with his dad. This wasn't a swimming accident. He was not overwhelmed by two feet of water and drowned. Rather, it was a gator attack waiting to happen, one the boy was just as much at risk to being on shore as being in the actual water. The difference is very important to the point of those who support them and their choice that night. Crucial.

SarahK said...

Not to defend Kate, but maybe she didn't announce the birth of the pups because she knew she would be harassed and pestered about irresponsible breeding, and overpopulation among dogs. You know, a case of being damned if she does talk about it, damned if she doesn't.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


Not to defend Kate, but maybe she didn't announce the birth of the pups because she knew she would be harassed and pestered about irresponsible breeding, and overpopulation among dogs. You know, a case of being damned if she does talk about it, damned if she doesn't.


&&&&

True but then, why mention it at all if she thought she was going to get criticized?

She's not damned if she just kept it quiet, because no one would know. She's only damned if she mentions it.

CC said...

Serendipity said...
I don't know. I guess I am just a hopeless hovering helicopter parent. My little guy is two years old, on the short side, and two-feet of water would be waist deep on him.
---------------------------
Not that it matters how deep the water was if the parent was there with him, but it's been reported that it was only about a foot of water.

As I stated above, an "average" two-year-old is about 3 feet tall.

CC said...

SarahK said...
f there are no swimming signs posted, that means don't go into the water, for whatever reason.
-----------------------
That's how you interpret it. I interpret "no swimming" as no swimming. Wading, or walking, in water, ankle deep, knee deep, etc is not swimming. It's wading. There's a difference.

If Disney didn't want people in the water they should not allow people in the water. They ALLOWED them to wade in the water. They should have posted No wading/No swimming signs. They didn't.

CC said...

The whole "no swimming" argument doesn't even matter because in reality the child could have been at the edge of the water and not in it and still been grabbed by the alligator.

Disney was wrong to not warn their guests of the dangers of alligators. Not everyone is aware alligators can get into man-made lagoons in a private resort in the middle of Orlando. I sure wasn't.

Susan1956 said...

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 98

This is a glaring example actually of her total ineptness in social media.

She should have mentioned this ages ago, when the bitch first got pregnant. She could build excitement and a following as we count down until the puppies. Then she could share pictures and videos all along from birth until now. Even if they are not in her custody she could have the breeders send her photos, most would be happy to.

Instead a full two months later it's, oh by the way something is happening that any joker can manage to get some "likes" over.
*****************************************

I think it also shows a glaring ineptness on the part of both TLC & TFMJG. After the debacle of the dating episode, do they think this story line--watching TFMJG cackle and simper over the logistics of breeding Shoka and the cuteness of her furry "grandbabies"--will bring back viewers and rate a mention in People? They are really scraping the bottom of the barrel--I'd say they have broken thru the bottom of the barrel and are digging a hole into the ground underneath at this point.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


That's how you interpret it. I interpret "no swimming" as no swimming. Wading, or walking, in water, ankle deep, knee deep, etc is not swimming. It's wading. There's a difference.


&&&

The manmade aspect of this is a real problem. Huge.

It's one thing to post a no swimming sign at a swamp in Florida. One would hope most people would make the connection there's probably animals in there. But manmade?? That's different.

This was manmade, and as you said, you assumed gators couldn't get in there. A reasonable assumption. Perhaps locals no better, but this is a resort that serves out-of-towners and foreigners even.

Every fact matters in this case. Comparisons to other no swimming signs are not all that relevant, due to the alarming uniqueness of this situation.

Some crucial facts that mislead the parents are: beach chairs and a beach atmosphere at the shore, hotel events staged right at the water at night, general encouragement of guests to visit this area and hang out at the water, manmade, lifeguards, no signs indicating even being at the shore is dangerous, and nothing specific about the no swimming warnings. Add to that out of town guests not familiar with gator safety, and a hotel that allowed a very dangerous practice of feeding them.

I would not be at all shocked if when all is said and done, this case is added to the Torts Law textbooks and part of every law student's syllabus. It's that informative to understanding liability. I hate to say it's interesting, because a child died, but unfortunately, a lot of interesting tort cases do involve death or serious injury. It is interesting.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


That's how you interpret it. I interpret "no swimming" as no swimming. Wading, or walking, in water, ankle deep, knee deep, etc is not swimming. It's wading. There's a difference.

&&&&

Agree. And, the last three major gator attacks all occurred when people and pets were not swimming. The dog was at the shore and the two humans were fishing and walking along shore. No one was in the water. In all three, the gators leapt from the water and took a bite at them.

Clearly, a no swimming sign is not enough to guard against gator attacks, even giving it a very liberal (too liberal IMO) interpretation (i.e. no "touching" the water)

Jane said...

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 104

&&&&

Jane, thank you so much for recommending this. I started watching it out of order, and it's phenomenal in its minutia (which I like). I started watching part 3 and then stopped and started over on part 1.

Marcia Clark participated and Gil Garcetti and Mark Furhman. I appreciate their humbleness in willing to dive into how the heck he got away with this. Marcia in particular is a class act.

I knew the DV was bad but I did not realize how truly psycho he was, including arranging "spies" to infiltrate Nicole's inner circle and report back to him. That's nuts.

I had also not seen most of the crime scene photos and DV photos they had.

For true crime fans this is for you. For anyone interested in civil rights and race relations this is for you.

*************
Glad you enjoyed it! I finished watching it this evening and found it to be one of the better things I've seen on television recently and certainly one of the best researched and thought out documentaries ever. It's very compelling and I loved how they spent time reviewing the mood of LA and the nation at that time. I hadn't known that 70+% of blacks thought him innocent and 70+% of whites thought him guilty. Those numbers tell the story.

I was surprised to see Marcia Clark's sense of humor and her clear delight when OJ was sentenced to 33 years in jail for the kidnapping and robbery in Vegas. Jeffrey Toobin (whom I've always admired) offered such great legal analysis and when he said he honestly thought he'd pass out from shock when the not guilty verdict was read…that brought it all back -- I was on the phone with my sister when the verdict came in and neither of us could speak.

In episode 5, one of his friends said something to the effect that OJ's downfall was that he loved fame too much, and I though of Kate.

I had never seen the crime scene photos of Nicole and Ron and those alone showed it had to be a crime of hate and passion. Brutal stuff.

This is definitely true crime at its best.

Jeanne said...

If it means more filming, Kate would breed Shoka or take in more dogs. She will do anything for filming. It's not like she has to take care of the dogs. The kids will or the nanny or the housekeeper or the local farmer. How long ago was it that she all of a sudden pretended on twitter to like Shoka and let him be inside more?

TLC stinks said...

I wonder why she announced the puppies on Twitter? As usual, there's no mention if the puppies are part of the family now, just that Shoka is the father. BTW, Shoka is not at his house in those pictures. We lived in a house with that exact vinyl siding. Her house is not vinyl siding. I believe Shoka, whom she claims hates to ride, was brought over to the female's home, strictly for a photo op. I do not believe Kate was even there. I bet the photos were taken by the female dog's owner. Want to bet the mother is the groomer's or someone who knows him? Shoka supposedly ok riding with the groomer.

TLC stinks said...

Sorry, she does say they are the newest family members. Doesn't mean they are at the house. I hope not.

TLC stinks said...

I agree the pups are props for her to fawn over like they are babies. Once they get big like Shoka, it's over. Totally explains all the Shoka love tweets for the past year. It's been planned for a long time. How irresponsible to not have Shoka neutered because any female dog could go onto her property.

She is the worst. Poor puppies will be caged just like Shoka and Nala. Guess the pups were another bribe to get the kids to continue filming. Maybe the pups were for the tups' bday? Anyway, if they are not laid back like Shoka, out they go.

Tucker's Mom said...

SarahK said... 107
Not to defend Kate, but maybe she didn't announce the birth of the pups because she knew she would be harassed and pestered about irresponsible breeding, and overpopulation among dogs. You know, a case of being damned if she does talk about it, damned if she doesn't.
******
I agree, however, that's never stopped her idiocy before ;-0
She's just added "backyard breeder" to her resume.

Tucker's Mom said...

And has been stated over and over, a no swimming sign does not adequately explain that it's dangerous even to be CLOSE to shore, as gators will leap several feet onto shore to grab their prey.
******
When a shark or sharks are spotted in coastal waters, beaches are CLOSED. When alligators regularly inhabit Disney's lagoon, that beach's status NEVER CHANGED.
It's more than an attractive nuisance. It's an invitation.
I mean, not even a rope. Not even a sign!

fidosmommy said...

Man, I hope she just went to visit the pups! I can see how Kate and TLC would think it would make a great episode - Shoka becomes a daddy dog and let's all watch the puppies interact with 9 children (Kateplus8)
while the cameras roll. Adorable puppies are a sure ratings boost. The crew can get footage of that without bringing any new animals home.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

TLC stinks (#118), family members are notoriously treated poorly by TFW. I hope these puppies know how to help her.

Tucker's Mom said...

She is the worst. Poor puppies will be caged just like Shoka and Nala. Guess the pups were another bribe to get the kids to continue filming. Maybe the pups were for the tups' bday? Anyway, if they are not laid back like Shoka, out they go.
******
It makes me sad that any puppy or puppies will be spending the vast majority of their lives outdoors, never to know the comfort and happiness of curling up in bed with the kids, or snuggling on the sofa, or getting tossed morsels while cooking or eating.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

I think she may find herself taking a lot of flak from the average user if these become actual episodes.

The anti-breeding lobby is kind of like the NRA, rabid and won't budge an inch.

Her only chance is these episodes escape attention because she's so old news by now. If this happened during her heyday, there would be outrage.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Admin (#125), didn't TFW donate the yard sale money to some local animal rescue organization? If so, I guess she's not exactly walking the talk about controlling the pet population. But puppies are so CUUUUTE, so I guess it's okay. That's what your average 12 year old would say, right?

And TFW will continue to be harassed and pestered as long as she makes a living off the backs of 8 minor children. She admitted to Larry King that she made her life our business, and she seems content with the trade off.

TLC stinks said...

Ordinarily, I love the idea of a dog having a buddy or two. They are pack animals for sure. And they are wonderful pets for kids, but Kate, even IF she was a dog lover, why not just adopt a dog from the shelter? Oh that's right...there's the history of her treatment of Nala and Shoka. Also, the pups are a way to make the kids want to stay home and not visit Jon, maybe?

Tucker's Mom said...

I can just hear Kate on the couch now.
"I've wanting Shoka's puppies for SO LONG!! I'm official the Best Mother In The World!!"
From Kate's caging of the dogs for insufferable periods of time. to putting shock collars on them, to not giving a crap that they run out into the road and go AWOL, to not neutering, to bitching about the cost of vet bills, it makes me ill to see that 2 puppies will face the same fate.
Shoka's breeder was a POS for not making Jon and Kate sign a contract to spay and neuter their dogs.

Becca said...

That is her property, not a sub division. The main house and the garage/apt. She mentioned several episodes ago that she wanted some Shokoa puppies. She has probably learned a thing or 2 about dogs, and I bet the kids take care of them. Good time of year to be raising puppies as well. I saw the blue rug and I though right away, pick that up! And they will chew on the deck. My 11 month old doddle just found a corner of my deck to gnaw on.

I think they will be fine with the puppies.

Becca

Tucker's Mom said...

Kate hasn't learned that dogs belong with their families, not left outdoors the vast majority of their lives. That's a deal breaker for me. Remember, she's got a bird in that house that lives out of its cage. There's no way those young puppies are going to be curled up in the kitchen, or on the sofa, with the family.
Those dogs will see the basement.
I wonder what's going to happen to the dogs when the kids are out of the house and Kate has to take care of them herself.

Becca said...

I get so tired of people insisting I get my dog from a shelter. Maybe I want a purebred. This is still America and I get to choose. Rescues are fine for those who want them. I have rescued 2 myself. But this last time I wanted something else. There are some fine backyard breeders and there are some bad ones.

Formerly Duped said...

Yeah, Kate the dog breeder. She failed as chef, baker, talk show host, writer, runner, gardener, blogger, couponer, organizing queen, OCD/germaphobe, multitasker, dazzling date, mother of the year, what else...

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Well, Stephanie's got some competition: I'm now being invited to meet Filipino women! I checked what the time was in Manila because I have family visiting there, so somehow Google assumed I was looking for chicks. I'm hot stuff these days!

Somewhere In Time said...

So if I am at a lake where no swimming is posted, and I am in the water up to my neck, and patrol comes by and says "No swimming allowed," I can argue that I am not swimming, I am walking, wading on the bottom of the lake?" I don't think that's going to fly! In order to be swimming, must one actually be kicking with the feet and doing swim strokes with the arms?

Formerly Duped said...

I guess you wear 'flimsy' nighties or something...!

Tucker's Mom said...

Becca said... 131
I get so tired of people insisting I get my dog from a shelter. Maybe I want a purebred. This is still America and I get to choose. Rescues are fine for those who want them. I have rescued 2 myself. But this last time I wanted something else. There are some fine backyard breeders and there are some bad ones.
******
I also have a pure bred and a rescue at the moment. Of course people should be able to buy pure breds if they want. I hope to always have my purebred. But, backyard breeders should own the fact that ONE DOG can lead to adding hundreds more dogs down the line. We have an appalling dog (and cat) population problem and thousands are destroyed everyday.
Kate and people like Kate are part of the problem.
If you want a purebred, go to a committed breeder who painstakingly mates for health and temperament, not to clone their favorite dog or make some cash on the side.
With regard specifically to Kate, this is just another selfish stunt that is no doubt for filming.
You can't fix stupid and narcissism. Anyone with a conscience would NEVER do what she did to those dogs. There is no learning curve. It's just not innate to Kate to understand the suffering of others.
What happens when those dogs are too much? This is the same woman who discarded Shoka's sister! Just gave her back after that girl became attached to her home, brother and family. The same woman put the family dog out of the house for AN ENTIRE YEAR! The same woman who left Shoka in FILTH. The same woman who just drove away, KNOWING her dogs were running around on a country road (where ime, people drive like lunatics). The same woman who bellyached about how much it cost to save Nala's life!
She hasn't the commitment for a dog.
Kate should stick to goldfish.

Tucker's Mom said...

This is still America and I get to choose.
******
Yup. Americans have the right to make all manner of stupendously bad and regrettable decisions!

Tucker's Mom said...

In order to be swimming, must one actually be kicking with the feet and doing swim strokes with the arms?
*****
That is the very definition of swimming, so yes.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


I get so tired of people insisting I get my dog from a shelter. Maybe I want a purebred.

$$$

The thing is though this doesn't look like purebred breeding. One of the puppies Lois like a golden! That I don't support, breeding just for the sake of it.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


So if I am at a lake where no swimming is posted, and I am in the water up to my neck, and patrol comes by and says "No swimming allowed," I can argue that I am not swimming, I am walking, wading on the bottom of the lake?" I don't think that's going to fly! I

&&&&

The question is, why is the lake not allowing swimming? You have a right to know. How far you were in is neither here nor there.

Tucker's Mom said...

One pup is definitely part golden. It's adorable.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that Kate didn't attempt to breed for the sake of the breed. She's just amusing herself and being selfish.
My guess is that she offered Shoka for stud in return for a pup or two, which she probably also won't neuter.

Mel said...

I don't really go with the technical definitions.

My definition of wading is walking or playing in shallow water, no higher than mid-calf. A toddler or infant I would allow to sit in shallow water and splash, especially if it was a hot day.

Swimming is anything deeper than your shins, regardless of what you're doing.

A no swimming sign, especially at large public venue, I would take as stay out of the water; if you're in the water, it's at your own risk because we have no life guard there.

The risk being drowning, not getting eaten by an alligator!

An alligator to me is a pretty severe risk...I would expect the venue to alert me to that (very real) possibility.

I would also expect that with sun chairs set up around the beach, and implied as a place to hang out, that wading in ankle deep water would probably be ok. They just don't want you out too deep due to no life guards.

I certainly wouldn't take a no swimming sign as don't go anywhere near the water because there are alligators!


Mel said...

TFW does nothing if not foreshadow. Remember when apropos of nothing she said she wanted to be on DWTS?

I think we even talked about the dog thing here, when all of a sudden she seemed to be showing positive interest in Shoka. I remember thinking, ah, something's up with filming and the dog.

Tucker's Mom said...

An alligator to me is a pretty severe risk...I would expect the venue to alert me to that (very real) possibility.

******
Exactly. We're not talking about a case of the runs if you swallow water, or even a staph infection (well, that could be deadly).

Tucker's Mom said...

Mel said... 143
TFW does nothing if not foreshadow. Remember when apropos of nothing she said she wanted to be on DWTS?
******
When your show's future is in doubt, make puppies!

TLC stinks said...

I agree. The light haired pup is not a pure bred German Shepherd. The kids must be thrilled. Nice bribe.

Deliverence said...

I don't think that's a golden retriever puppy. Goldens have longish, hang down type ears.

fidosmommy said...

I can give you the definitive definition of swimming. It is moving full tilt through the water with legs and arms moving in perfect stroke formation. Anything else is a waste of time. Source: my nationally ranked swimming coach of our nationally ranked team.

Realizing that most people see swimming as more recreational than competitive, I have had to alter the definition.

Swimming is what you make it to be, IMO.

Adopt Don't Shop said...

Becca said... 131
I get so tired of people insisting I get my dog from a shelter. Maybe I want a purebred. This is still America and I get to choose. Rescues are fine for those who want them. I have rescued 2 myself. But this last time I wanted something else. There are some fine backyard breeders and there are some bad ones.
$$$$$$
Yes, you do get to choose. And in America, people also get to express their opinions about your choice. I would never buy an animal when thousands are euthanized for space each year. 25% of dogs in shelters are purebred and there are plenty of breed-specific rescues.

Tucker's Mom said...

Deliverence said... 147
I don't think that's a golden retriever puppy. Goldens have longish, hang down type ears.
June 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM
*******
Hmm...maybe collie.
My yellow lab mix has a bit of collie, I think. The ears are wonky.

Tucker's Mom said...

Swimming is what you make it to be, IMO.
*******
The definition is pretty clear. There are many manners of being in water, however.
Bottom line- Disney's signage sucked.

Tucker's Mom said...

I hardly think recreational swimming is a waste of time! A waste is any human drowning because they don't know how.

GollyGee said...

Formerly Duped said... 132
Yeah, Kate the dog breeder. She failed as chef, baker, talk show host, writer, runner, gardener, blogger, couponer, organizing queen, OCD/germaphobe, multitasker, dazzling date, mother of the year, what else...

------------------

Let's add: Failed miserably as a receiver of a special gift from her sweet son Colin.

Failed miserably as a wife to her husband.

Failed miserably as a daughter.

She has failed as a parent, across the board.

Any mother who would allow the smut that is on her twitter timeline is a certifiable moron. Can't believe TLC hasn't made her get it off of there. Do they want her to keep it on there to justify not to bring a "special" back on their lineup?

Failed even more miserably as a liar. When you don't tell the truth, that means that you are telling a lie. Busted million of times for her lies and she keeps on lying.
Lying though her white veneer teeth has flourished her, benefited her, got her things that she never dreamed of.

Jane said...

Absolutely, adopting from a shelter or a rescue group is the way to go. However, there are times when it's not possible, when the desire for and the ability to care for a puppy or dog means it's necessary to go to a breeder.

My son badly wanted a dog but is horribly allergic to anything with dander, birds included! Allergic to the point of having to use an epipen when he went to friends' homes who had cats or dogs. After doing a lot of research, he found a reputable breeder, not a backyard breeder, but someone with credentials and he adopted a non-allergenic dog. Eight years later he's fine and the dog continues to have a wonderful home and is just the cutest and best dog ever.

Shelters and rescue organizations couldn't guarantee that any puppies or dogs were pure breeds. And to adopt a puppy and then have to return it would be heartbreaking. So…. while he (and I) support shelters, there are times when it's just not possible to adopt from one.

Tucker's Mom said...

there are plenty of breed-specific rescues.
*****
Great point.
I remember watching Victoria Stilwell's show on dog training. She was dealing with a dog whose owner kept him intact, which can of course, lead to a more dominant and even aggressive dog (IIRC, this dog was a pit bull).
Stilwell walked the owner to her backyard, where she had hundred and hundreds of big plastic balls place. She picked up ONE ball and said something to the effect of, "this is YOUR dog. Your ONE dog can produce THIS MANY puppies over their lifetime".
What Kate did was not innocuous. Unless Shoka's litter is all spayed and neutered, she has just made the problem worse.

Tucker's Mom said...

Any mother who would allow the smut that is on her twitter timeline is a certifiable moron.
****
Couldn't agree more. She's a moron of the highest order. Kate admonished people for bad language, acknowledging that children read her twitter (and I'm sure they do). Yet here she is, with porn littering her twitter, and she does nothing. Says nothing. Pretends it isn't there.

Tucker's Mom said...

I'm so glad you found a dog for your son! There are definitely good reasons to use good breeders. But, when you get that dog, spay or neuter!

Adopt Don't Shop said...

Shelters and rescue organizations couldn't guarantee that any puppies or dogs were pure breeds. And to adopt a puppy and then have to return it would be heartbreaking. So…. while he (and I) support shelters, there are times when it's just not possible to adopt from one.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Absolutely. Your scenario is a little different from the "I want a purebred so sue me" mentality expressed by Becca.

TLC stinks said...

The kids are lucky to get a couple of puppies, bred or not. Shoka is lucky to have playmates. Kate's motive is what is appalling. Anyone who is a dog person can tell she is not; I don't care how many pictures she tweets of Shoka napping. She has been trying to reinvent her image as an animal lover ever since the truth came out about her treatment of Shoka and Nala.

Tucker's Mom said...

I'm reading parts of Robert's book-parts about Shoka:

Em tweets Kate about Shoka giving her a goodnight kiss and Kate responds that the dog is NEVER allowed to kiss her.
wtf? Doggy smooches are my favorite.

The dog is known to kill and eat God knows what because he's outside, unsupervised, day and night, yet she still litters her yard with plastic Easter eggs for her photo-op hunts, knowing damn well that Shoka eats them.
(Robert saw this with his own eyes)

For spite, yes, spite, she made Jon take care of the dogs even when he wasn't living there. When Kate was at the house, she let the dogs live in their own filth and left it for Jon.

Reading Robert's account of Shoka and Nala escaping the property when Kate drove off, knowing the peril they were in, is nothing short of harrowing. They were almost hit several times. Kate comes home is is all, 'yeah, thanks, whatever" and doesn't give it a second thought. I'd be beside myself!

Anyone who does what Kate Gosselin has done to animals should have their Pet Owner card permanently revoked.

NJGal51 said...

I also get so tired of hearing "adopt don't shop". I just brought home my 8 1/2 week old English Bulldog puppy. We got him from a very reputable breeder. With bully's you need to go to a reputable breeder because you want a healthy pup. There are no bulldog rescue organizations in my area and the ones we donate to don't adopt out of state.

The best $30 I have spent recently was for a portable puppy playpen from Amazon. It was on sale from $100!

jamezvader1194 said...

@GollyGee Well her looking back special that was suppose to air and they reschedule twice is on youtube.Don't know if TLC will ever air that or if it'll be aired at a later date.Although this kinda begs the question as to why they were quickly trying to air it at an earlier date then pull it twice?

Carole said...

The manmade aspect of this is a real problem. Huge.

It's one thing to post a no swimming sign at a swamp in Florida. One would hope most people would make the connection there's probably animals in there. But manmade?? That's different.

This was manmade, and as you said, you assumed gators couldn't get in there. A reasonable assumption.

******

I agree that the lake being man-made may give visitors a different impression about wildlife than if it was natural, but just looking at the area, I sure can't tell that it's man-made and I personally would assume it was full of the same things found in natural lakes all over FL. I don't think most visitors can tell it isn't natural just by looking at it either. That lake is huge, big enough for boating and lots of water activities which is another reason Disney's original "no swimming" signage was insufficient and imo, misleading.

Susan1956 said...

GollyGee said... 153

Lying though her white veneer teeth has flourished her, benefited her, got her things that she never dreamed of.
************************************8
I think she was dreaming of bigger and better things long before she got big, pearly, white veneers. Didn't her brother say she always conned others into doing her work and didn't she herself reference watching Princess Di's wedding? Once she read Bobbi McCaughey's book (I'm sure she saw them as quaint and provincial)she was off and running in her quest to become a STAR, running over the little people and her family

Jane said...

Tucker's Mom said... 157
I'm so glad you found a dog for your son! There are definitely good reasons to use good breeders. But, when you get that dog, spay or neuter!
****************

Thanks. The best part is that when he travels, the dog gets to visit! She's such a love. (as is the kid LOL)

Tucker's Mom said...

Fired Up 4 Kate ‏@MiloandJack 12m12 minutes ago
Fired Up 4 Kate Retweeted Kate Gosselin
Patience please..PuppyPhase..Pee/Poop/Play ALL DAY! LOL #WhatMomsDoForTheirKids https://twitter.com/Kateplusmy8/status/744585363969150976 … https://twitter.com/Kateplusmy8/status/744585562686894080 … @Kateplusmy8
****
Oh, please, on all counts. I don't think for a minute that Kate is going to get up in the middle of the night to walk the puppies. Those pups will be crated just like Shoka- way too long.
Kate is doing this for herself, first. Like Shoka, it's a great storyline.

Tucker's Mom said...

The best $30 I have spent recently was for a portable puppy playpen from Amazon. It was on sale from $100!

*****
Wow great price! I got a pen for my bichon when we brought him home, and decided to keep that for his "crate".
I initially got my first bichon because I have allergies (and asthma) and didn't want to risk having to return a dog because I reacted badly. Turns out, both have been improved and well-managed with meds, and even my shedding (like a fiend, sometimes!) yellow lab doesn't bother me.
Good point about rescues and shelters which offer "purebreds". MANY time, they are puppy mill rescues and have horrible congenital problems because of careless breeding. Not that it would totally put me off, but it's something to consider.

Adopt Don't Shop said...

I also get so tired of hearing "adopt don't shop". I just brought home my 8 1/2 week old English Bulldog puppy. We got him from a very reputable breeder. With bully's you need to go to a reputable breeder because you want a healthy pup. There are no bulldog rescue organizations in my area and the ones we donate to don't adopt out of state.
$$$$$
Well, I get so tired of hearing that over 2M healthy dogs and cats are put down each yearHams caused the pet overpopulation problem through irresponsible behavior and it's our responsibility to solve it. Adopting from a shelter or rescue saves a life. Buying a dog does not. For those of us who support the adopt don't shop philosophy, saving a life comes first.

Tucker's Mom said...

Thanks. The best part is that when he travels, the dog gets to visit! She's such a love. (as is the kid LOL)
*****
We have several dog "grandparents' who babysit their kids' dogs. They love it.

Math Girl said...

Tucker's Mom said... 156
Any mother who would allow the smut that is on her twitter timeline is a certifiable moron.
****
Couldn't agree more. She's a moron of the highest order. Kate admonished people for bad language, acknowledging that children read her twitter (and I'm sure they do). Yet here she is, with porn littering her twitter, and she does nothing. Says nothing. Pretends it isn't there.
----------------------
I'm not sure how twitter works, but it's possible that she doesn't see them. They are not tweeted to kate (@kateplusmy8), but only contain the words "Kate Gosselin". When you do a search for @kateplusmy8, twitter includes them as a "bonus". Perhaps when Kate signs on to twitter, she doesn't see the "bonus" tweets?

Tucker's Mom said...

Even *if* Kate hasn't seen the porn on her twitter, Milo and others have tweeted her and @Twitter about it on numerous occasions.
She knows.

Sad but true said...

FYI, it is possible for a bitch (not K8, lol) to whelp a single litter from different fathers. All she has to do is have relations with two different dogs during her fertile period. If this were a controlled breeding, this presumably would not have happened. Unless that was the desired result (which would not have been guaranteed). That golden puppy does not belong to Shoka, unless this is what the mother looks like (i.e., she's not a pure-bred German shepherd).

jamezvader1194 said...

@Math Girl,the thing is Milo included Kate into the tweets where she was telling twitter support to get rid of the porn bots,so unless she didn't see those twits in her notifications,i doubt she doesn't know about it and plus i can see Kate typing in her name in the search bar just to see what people are talking about her.

Sad but true said...

So the Duggars have rustled up another courtship, just in time to stave off further discussion of cancellation. Aw, and all poor Kate got was puppies.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Sad but true (#172), maybe we should call in Jerry Springer to do a paternity test!

Sad but true said...

FlimsyFlamsy said... 175

I don't doubt she's already called him, lol!

NJGal51 said...

Adopt Don't Shop - I will agree to disagree with you. I support NSAL, Bianca's Furry Friends and LI bulldog rescue (along with our local shelter) and I do resent your sanctimonious attitude towards me.

Tucker's Mom said...

Sad but true said... 174
So the Duggars have rustled up another courtship, just in time to stave off further discussion of cancellation. Aw, and all poor Kate got was puppies.
******
I saw that. Another storyline, whew! Apparently, if your child dates a Duggar, you have to be on board with speaking to Radar and People.
Does the fact that your son is dating Jinger and will be hanging around a child molester bother you?
No! Not at all! Can't wait until my grandkids are near his paws!

Tucker's Mom said...

Kate GosselinVerified account ‏@Kateplusmy8 4m4 minutes ago
The kids are in the pool, the puppies r napping inside. I'm outside grilling...&Shokas guarding us all #ILoveSummer

Kate's got the puppies. Two again. At least I hope they're both boys because Kate does not like female dogs.
Irony.

Tucker's Mom said...

NJGal51 said... 177
Adopt Don't Shop - I will agree to disagree with you. I support NSAL, Bianca's Furry Friends and LI bulldog rescue (along with our local shelter) and I do resent your sanctimonious attitude towards me.
June 20, 2016 at 3:51 PM
8*******
The holier-than-thou attitude does the cause no favors. The bottom line is to be a good dog owner and give your dog love, care, affection, health and nutrition, no matter the provenance.

Sad but true said...

Does this make any sense to anyone?

Fired Up 4 Kate ‏@MiloandJack 4h4 hours ago
Fired Up 4 Kate Retweeted Kate Gosselin
Questions abound? Did #Maks & #Nanuq come from same litter?

Kate GosselinVerified account
‏@Kateplusmy8
@MiloandJack Answer: Mak &Nanuq are full shepherd (Shoka =1/2king&1/2shepherd;mom is full king)siblings.There were 4 sable pups in litter!

What is a "king"? And how do you get a "full king" out of 3/4-king parentage? Very strange.

Tucker's Mom said...

MsGoody2Shoes21 ‏@msgoody2shoes21 4m4 minutes ago
@mylilabbster @MiloandJack @Kateplusmy8 I'd like a dog too. I just don't have the time (commitment) to have a pet. Pets deserve good a life.

Neither does Kate, and yes, they do.

Sad but true said...

Re above on dog genetics, I meant how do you get full shepherd out of what seems to be 3/4-king parentage. Leave it to Kate.

Tucker's Mom said...

Irene ‏@CrochetAllDay 3m3 minutes ago
Trying to potty train LO. Ppl give @Kateplusmy8 grief, but she potty trained 6 at one time! She's my goddess! BTW, Any tips? šŸ˜• #KatePlus8

Tip #1- Don't hit your 2-year old for having an accident after 5 days of potty training.

Tip #2- Be sure to have a film crew put cameras in your kid's face and film him or her pulling their pants down and sitting on the potty.

Tip #3- Put you kid on the pot and make him sit there for however long it takes for him to tinkle. Don't forget to close the door and turn off the light.

FlimsyFlamsy said...

Sad but true (#174), it'll be interesting to see if the new season of the Duggar girls' show gets scheduled before TFW's 10th anniversary extravaganza. The longer TLC waits to air it, the less invested in her they seem. #SucksBeingASidepiece

Over And Out said...

I wish that Milo and Kate would just get a room and consummate this relationship. Milo's lust is out of control. For heaven's sake, go see Kate, give her hugs and kisses and if it leads to a more passionate relationship, go for it. I'm sure LOM won't mind, or even miss her.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

MsGoody2Shoes21 ‏@msgoody2shoes21 4m4 minutes ago
@mylilabbster @MiloandJack @Kateplusmy8 I'd like a dog too. I just don't have the time (commitment) to have a pet. Pets deserve good a life.


&&&&

Well who knew MsGoody would be the voice of reason in all this.

She is too busy being inflammatory on twitter but that's all fine, the point is she understands she has no business caring for an animal.

Kate is tweeting about the dogs being at the house. I fear the worse, they now have three dogs. What a travesty. And puppies that young are WAY too little to be left alone inside to nap. Much like a two year old, they need to be watched, within reason. They get into things, and they pee and need constant supervision much like a toddler needs to be watched as we have talked about so much the past few days.

Also thanks for confirming Kate this was just breeding for the sake of breeding. You've now created two mutt pups who, while adorable, are of absolutely no monetary value or purebred value, instead of adopting two pups who are now going to be euthanized. The two dead pups thank you for that.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

By the way as to the OJ documentary (why thanks again Jane!!!) they have two defense attorneys going on record admitting they staged his house with a bunch of photos of black people for the jury viewing.

How did this happen and why are there not consequences for it? I don't understand. I also don't understand why they're admitting it now if not for clearing their conscience. Choices like that seem like enough to get someone disbarred, it's that unconscionable.

I believe OJ when he said race never really occurred to him before. He flowed freely among any racial community and was attracted to all races. He actively avoided getting involved in racial issues, when interviewed never had much of an opinion on current racial issues and didn't even seem to be all that interested. He disappointed the black community by not doing more for them during his fame.

Even OJ seemed rather stunned how they made the whole trial about race. That for the first time in his life he actually took notice of how many blacks were in the room. I believe him that race wasn't a factor him--but it was for the community, and he got caught up in it and benefited from it.

Fascinating study. And actually, as much as I think OJ is a pathological nut job who murdered two people, it says a lot about how he was raised that he was able to just live his life and be successful without feeling the burdens of his race. It's a real "deal with the hand you're dealt and get on with it and be successful anyway" attitude I admire.

Fleecing The Sheeple said...

Some Church Ladies humor:

Darlene Casto ‏@bigbrotherdar
Lmbo Harry Mayes brung Junebug a better than sex cake she say prove it. ORNERY

What could possibly be better than a sex cake?

Patty Parsons ‏@PattyParsonsPat
Patty Parsons Retweeted Shelley Moore Capito
Touch of roseasia???

Are you sure it's not roseeurope or roseaustralia?

Patty Parsons ‏@PattyParsonsPat
Pooping blood that ain't good

Patty Parsons ‏@PattyParsonsPat
Wasn't pooping blood it was the beets I ate

Whew! What a relief that must have been!

Patty Parsons ‏@PattyParsonsPat
Babs has asked me to go to the beach with her only one bed I don't know about this

Sleep on the sofa!

Junebug Roush ‏@JunebugRoush
I got the best bday present of all "Junebug Roush you have been selected to serve on the grand jury in mason county!"

Oh, geez, I hope not! Don't they vet jurors in Mason County? LOL!

Junebug Roush ‏@JunebugRoush 4h4 hours ago
Kim ask me ifan I had seed 2 girls one cup on the computer. I said you girls don't be drinking after each other you'll have mono again.

Only if one of them has mono!

TLC stinks said...

Well, I learned something new. There are WHITE German Shepherds.

TLC stinks said...

Admin said:
I fear the worse, they now have three dogs. What a travesty. And puppies that young are WAY too little to be left alone inside to nap. Much like a two year old, they need to be watched, within reason. They get into things, and they pee and need constant supervision...

&&&&&&&&&

Just as Kate left her babies in their cribs for LONG hours unsupervised, the puppies are no doubt caged (a lot). Of course she has not changed.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


A no swimming sign, especially at large public venue, I would take as stay out of the water; if you're in the water, it's at your own risk because we have no life guard there.

The risk being drowning, not getting eaten by an alligator!

An alligator to me is a pretty severe risk...I would expect the venue to alert me to that (very real) possibility.

I would also expect that with sun chairs set up around the beach, and implied as a place to hang out, that wading in ankle deep water would probably be ok. They just don't want you out too deep due to no life guards.

I certainly wouldn't take a no swimming sign as don't go anywhere near the water because there are alligators!


&&&&

That's IT! Eureka!

And that's why Disney is going down.

You know this is like a wet paint sign. While you should probably follow the sign, the most you would expect from disobeying it and touching it anyway, is a bunch of paint that stains your clothes. But let's say the wet paint sign was also very hot paint that burns your skin if you touch it, third degree burns. You don't say, well the person never should have touched the paint due to the "wet paint" sign. Well, of course they shouldn't have, but third degree burns are not what one would expect from just a damn wet paint sign.

This gets into expected risk issues, a reasonable person's expectation of outcomes as a result of certain events. Which is real deep stuff in tort law. If they won't settle with Disney, this trial could go on months getting through all this.

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...

Oh forgot to add, just because someone takes a no swimming sign very liberally as in don't even touch the water, doesn't mean the average person does. It's reasonable to take a no swimming sign as a risk of drowning or bad water, and that a little dip before bed at the water's edge and ignoring the "rules," would be harmless. Signs need to account for all types of people, including very cautious people but also those that are a little more laid back. You can't assume everyone is always on max hyper alert.

Water doesn't scare me and I've swam without lifeguards and touched water when conditions are shaky, but I do have a fear of heights and falling, and when I see signs warning of unstable ground or don't walk there, which you tend to see a lot in the CA cliffs, I stay many feet away from even the sign and don't like to go anywhere near that. But I understand most people will walk right up to the sign and maybe even a few feet beyond, and would not expect the danger to be that close to the sign. Which means you need to put the sign at least several yards away from the danger to account for that. People respond differently to warnings and various degrees need to be accounted for.

Bottom line, that's why a no swimming sign without more (i.e. serious death or injury due to gator attacks) was not enough, because it doesn't account for people who don't take things literally.

Fleecing The Sheeple said...

The question is, why is the lake not allowing swimming? You have a right to know. How far you were in is neither here nor there.

==========

There are many reasons lakes don't allow swimming, such as no lifeguards, water pollution, owner liability if something happens on private property, toxic algae, snakes...

I think the point was missed on that post. When does wading become swimming? :)

Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said...


There are many reasons lakes don't allow swimming, such as no lifeguards, water pollution, owner liability if something happens on private property, toxic algae, snakes...

I think the point was missed on that post. When does wading become swimming? :)


&&&&

I don't care about the point hehe! :)

Because this could have happened swimming, wading or walking on shore never touching the water. At this resort you couldn't remove the risk of gators by not swimming OR wading, however you define it. Basically anything near shore was a grave risk to their guests.

Jane said...

Admin (and others!) Today's NY Times has an interesting article on both OJ shows.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/26/arts/television/oj-simpson-trial-made-in-america.html

NJGal51 said...

http://www.germanshepherds.com/forum/general-puppy-stuff/92246-gsd-vs-king-shepherds.html

Interesting info on GSD vs king shepherd. I don't understand how TFW can say the pups are full shepherd since Shoka is only 1/2 GSD and 1/2 King. As far as leaving the puppies inside to nap, they're only a day older than mine and you can bet that he's not being left alone unless he's in his area - we move the table and chairs out of the breakfast nook and gate it off until he's fully potty trained and somewhat trustworthy to be left alone.

Thanks Tucker's Mom @180, I agree 100%.

Ingrid said...

I don't understand how TFW can say the pups are full shepherd since Shoka is only 1/2 GSD and 1/2 King.
------------
I think she can say it because GSD and King are both shepards. She didn't say he was a pure King Shepard or pure GSD.

Fleecing The Sheeple said...

Michele Giarratano ‏@sunshinepawleys 2h2 hours ago
@Kateplusmy8 what is the name brand of that shirt you have on by the bbq?

This nut is still pestering Kate about this dang shirt! Good grief, Kate...just send it to her and put her out of her misery!

She had tweeted Kate about her hair color many times (wanted Kate to ask Gibson the name of the color); then went out and bought the same dress that Kate wore at an event; and she started tweeting Kate last June about the shirt. This one doesn't give up!

Sad but true said...

Ingrid said... 198
I don't understand how TFW can say the pups are full shepherd since Shoka is only 1/2 GSD and 1/2 King.
------------
I think she can say it because GSD and King are both shepards. She didn't say he was a pure King Shepard or pure GSD.
--------
Then why make any distinction at all? She's claiming the pups as "full shepherd" even though the mom is full king and Shoka is 1/2 king and 1/2 shepherd. I still don't get it. I bet she doesn't, either, but has latched on to some breeder terminology.

«Oldest ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 1681   Newer› Newest»